UCLA neuroscientist Matthew Lieberman has demonstrated that
the human brain is hard-wired to facilitate social connection. We are, at the
roots of our brain architecture, social beings.
Maria Popova (at Brain Pickings) summarizes the argument
Lieberman makes in his new book, Social:
Why Our Brains are Wired to Connect:
Lieberman,
who has spent the past two decades using tools like fMRI to study how the human
brain responds to its social context, has found over and over again that our
brains aren’t merely simplistic mechanisms that only respond to pain and
pleasure, as philosopher Jeremy Bentham famously claimed, but are instead wired
to connect.
In his study Lieberman discovered that social pain, the pain
that comes from feeling disconnected has much in common with physical pain:
By activating the same neural circuitry that
causes us to feel physical pain, our experience of social pain helps ensure the
survival of our children by helping to keep them close to their parents. The
neural link between social and physical pain also ensures that staying socially
connected will be a lifelong need, like food and warmth. Given the fact that
our brains treat social and physical pain similarly, should we as a society
treat social pain differently than we do?
Obviously, this has implications
for therapy.
A psychotherapy that wants you to
get into your mind, to the exclusion of developing and building good
relationships, cannot possibly provide a benefit.
Lieberman is especially interested in how this capacity
evolved. He added that sociability is the key to our species’ success:
Our sociality is woven into a series of bets
that evolution has laid down again and again throughout mammalian history.
These bets come in the form of adaptations that are selected because they
promote survival and reproduction. These adaptations intensify the bonds we
feel with those around us and increase our capacity to predict what is going on
in the minds of others so that we can better coordinate and cooperate with
them. The pain of social loss and the ways that an audience’s laughter can
influence us are no accidents. To the extent that we can characterize evolution
as designing our modern brains, this is what our brains were wired for:
reaching out to and interacting with others. These are design features, not
flaws. These social adaptations are central to making us the most successful
species on earth.
The brain has different circuits
that promote different kinds of social relationships. The intimacy of a love
relationship is not the same as the connection we form by belonging to an
extended family, by being neighborly or by working with a team.
How did this all come to pass?
Lieberman says there are three
ways we develop sociability: connection, mindreading and harmonizing.
In his words:
On connection:
Long before there were any primates with a
neocortex, mammals split off from other vertebrates and evolved the capacity to
feel social pains and pleasures, forever linking our well-being to our social
connectedness. Infants embody this deep need to stay connected, but it is
present through our entire lives.
On what he calls mindreading:
Primates have developed an unparalleled ability
to understand the actions and thoughts of those around them, enhancing their
ability to stay connected and interact strategically. In the toddler years,
forms of social thinking develop that outstrip those seen in the adults of any
other species. This capacity allows humans to create groups that can implement
nearly any idea and to anticipate the needs and wants of those around us,
keeping our groups moving smoothly.
Perhaps mindreading is not the
best term, but Lieberman is correct to point out the importance of teamwork, of coordinating activities and dividing tasks among members of a group.
And on harmonizing with others:
Although the self may appear to be a mechanism
for distinguishing us from others and perhaps accentuating our selfishness, the
self actually operates as a powerful force for social cohesiveness. During the
preteen and teenage years, adolescent refers to the neural adaptations that
allow group beliefs and values to influence our own.
I would add that harmonizing with
other people can only take place when people make an effort to make their
conversations an equal exchange, when they follow the same customs and practice
the same manners, when they are polite and courteous, and when they attune their
voices to those of their interlocutors.
3 comments:
What has Lieberman given us that we didn't know already? How much does he get paid to say the obvious?
Human beings are designed to be social. Wow. What would I do with that?
Here's a more important line of questioning, one that will get at what one does with this sociability...
If man is hard wired to be social, why is it that his fellow man drives him nuts?
Why is it that man often chooses to avoid social connection, and that prolonged aversion to social interaction isolates him, leading to greater personal misery? Why would a rational man choose this path, one which will progressively compromise his sanity?
Why can he send a man to the moon but he cannot meaningfully connect to the person in the cube next to him at work?
Tip
John Cacioppo, a professor at the U of Chicago has done much work in this area as well.
Thanks for reminding us of John Cacioppo. I have posted about him in the past. Here's a file:
http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/search?q=john+cacioppo
Post a Comment