A funny thing happened on the way to the coronation.
Well, maybe it wasn’t that funny. It certainly was not funny
for Marco Rubio, the establishment choice for the Republican presidential nomination.
Just as all thoughtful and sensible Republicans were trying to awaken from a nightmare-- of having to choose between Trump and Cruz, thus trying to
measure whom they hated least--lo and behold, Marco Rubio put in a creditable
performance in the Iowa caucuses. Not only was he young and fresh-faced, but
Rubio, the Republican establishment assured us, was a sure winner.
Said establishment does not have a very good record choosing
presidential candidates. Having chosen exactly one winner in the past two
decades, its track record leaves a lot to be desired.
It brings to mind the performance of another Republican boy
wonder, Paul Ryan when he faced off with Vice President Joe Biden in the 2012
vice presidential debate. We had been assured by the Republican establishment
and the conservative intelligentsia that Ryan was the real deal, a great mind,
a big thinker, a true intellectual in the line of Ayn Rand.
But then, Joe Biden made Ryan look callow, jejune… in way
over his head. Biden made Ryan look more like a boy scout than a serious
candidate for major public office. It was one of those moments that turned the
tide toward Obama. If Mitt Romney’s first presidential decision was to choose
someone who was manifestly too young for the job, what did that say about Mitt?
It did not faze the Republican establishment. Perhaps they
were watching a different broadcast. They just made Ryan Speaker of the House
of Representatives. Hmmm.
In any event, Republicans who were traumatized by the 2012
debates want above all else to find a candidate who is not going to wilt in the
klieg lights. For most of them, that means Trump or Cruz. Thus, good
Republicans were flocking to Marco Rubio, to save them from Trump or Cruz…
until last night.
Rubio had been sailing above the barrage of negative ads
that Jeb Bush had been throwing at him. Last night, he ran into a street
fighter, a brawler, a former federal prosecutor named Chris Christie. And, in
the faceoff, Rubio came out looking bad. He came out looking like what Christie
had been calling him, a boy in a bubble. He looked like a child and he looked scripted and robotic. He could only defend himself against looking robotic by acting even
more robotic. He repeated the same line eight times... count 'em.
Since I had already opined a few days ago that Marco Rubio
seemed to be coming across as weak, I was somewhat relieved to have been right
about at least one thing.
The Daily Mail tells what happened:
Marco
Rubio stumbled in Saturday night's Republican primary debate as Chris Christie got
the better of him during the GOP's New Hampshire slugfest.
Christie,
the governor of New Jersey, hammered Florida's 44-year-old junior senator for
repeating canned talking points and leaning on a thin U.S. Senate resume.
'When
you're President of the United States, when you're a governor of a state, the
memorized 30-second speech where you talk about how great America is at the end
of it doesn't solve one problem for one person,' Christie jabbed.
Rubio
fell right into Christie's trap as he struggled to respond, repeating the same
canned line four times – drawing catcalls on Twitter and a scolding from the
New Jersey governor.
It continues:
Christie
laid it on thick as he repeated the attacks he's been catapulting at Rubio from
afar to his face in tonight's debate.
Governors
are responsible for plowing snow and keeping schools open, he said, holding up
his own leadership in New Jersey as a model.
'And
when the worst natural disaster in your state's history hits you, they expect
you to rebuild their state, which is what I've done,' he said. 'None of that
stuff happens on the floor of the United States Senate. It's a fine job, I'm
glad you ran for it, but it does not prepare you for President of the United
States.'
Rubio
gamely responded that last month as New Jersey faced a blizzard, he continued
campaigning in New Hampshire.
'They
had to shame you into going back,' Rubio told him. 'Then you stayed there for
36 hours and then...left and came back to campaign.'
And
pushing back on Christie's contention that he's be as bad for the country as
Barack Obama, Rubio said more than once: 'This notion that Barack Obama doesn't
know what he's doing is just not true. He knows exactly what he's doing.'
By the
third time he said it, Christie was ready.
'There
it is. There it is. The memorized 25-second speech. There it is, everybody,' he
interjected.
It was
a shaky moment in the campaign for Rubio, who was visibly thrown off his
footing by the confrontation with Christie and booing from the audience after
what he thought was a money shot.
Then the question turned to Rubio’s inexperience, his lack
of substantive achievements:
Christie
and other Republican White House hopefuls have turned attacks on Rubio's
habitual failure to show up for Senate votes or fight for contested legislation
into a pillar of their stump speeches in New Hampshire.
Debate
moderators brought up the accusations and Rubio parried concerns about his
limited experience by reciting a list of accomplishments he's been touting on
the campaign trail.
'If
politics becomes, and the presidency becomes, about electing people who have
been in Congress or in the Senate the longest, we should all rally around Joe
Biden. He's been around 1,000 years,' Rubio said.
As a
U.S. senator Biden passed 'hundreds of bills,' he said, and I don't think any
of us believe Joe Biden should be President of the United States.'
He also
said he's nothing like Barack Obama, another first-term senator who ran for
president and Republicans say is running the country into the ground because he
didn't have the necessary experience to be commander-in-chief.
'Let's
dispel once and for all with this fiction that Barack Obama doesn't know what
he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing,' Rubio hit back. 'Barack Obama is
undertaking a systematic effort to change this country, to make America more
like the rest of the world.'
Christie
rejected that defense and said, 'Marco, you shouldn't compare yourself to Joe
Biden and you shouldn't say that that's what we're doing. ....You have not been
involved in a consequential decision where you had to be held accountable. You
just simply haven't.'
Invoking
a bill Rubio regularly counts as a feather in his cap that put sanctions on
Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based terrorist group, Christie told him, 'You weren't
even there to vote for it. That's not leadership, that's truancy.'
'And
the fact is that what we need to do...is not to make the same mistake we made
eight years ago,' he said, drawing a comparison between Rubio and Obama. 'It
does matter when the challenges don't come on a list of a piece of paper of
what to vote yes or no every day, but when the problems come in from the people
that you serve.'
Christie
said, 'I like Marco Rubio, and he's a smart person and a good guy, but he
simply does not have the experience to be president of the United States and
make these decisions.'
But, will this exchange move New Hampshire voters? We do not
know. The story of the Rubio-Christie dustup is all over the media today, so I
suspect that it will have some effect.
Anyone who had been thinking that Marco Rubio was like a
ninja warrior, slick and deadly, should have another think. I found it
interesting that Rubio brought up the name of Joe Biden. Do you really want a
repeat of the Biden-Ryan debates?
2 comments:
The imprimatur of the GOPe is the kiss of death in the eyes of conservative Republicans.
Then there are that Gang of 8 and immigration ideas stuck to him.
Oh, had Rubio already been delegated as potential VP?
Vox agreed Rubio failed to inspire:
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/7/10929762/republican-debate-winners-losers-rubio-trump
-----
And Marco Rubio appeared totally incapable of speaking extemporaneously rather than returning repeatedly to his pre-memorized script.
...
But taking a step back, the biggest loser of the night, by far, was Marco Rubio. And a loss for Rubio, on the eve of New Hampshire, is almost by definition a win for Trump, his weird personal rivalry with Jeb Bush aside.
...
The establishment's best hope was to have one candidate, probably Rubio, soak up his likeminded competitors' votes enough to become a credible threat to Trump.
...
The Rubio campaign has been widely mocked for its so-called 3-2-1 strategy, in which Rubio finishes third in Iowa, second in New Hampshire, and then first in South Carolina. It's still unclear how exactly they expect to win in South Carolina (Rubio's losing by about 23 points currently), but if they have any hope of winning there, a close loss to Trump in New Hampshire is a necessary prerequisite.
By totally blowing tonight's debate, Rubio made the "2" component of his plan significantly less likely.
...
Saturday, February 6, 2016 will forever be known as the day that Marco Rubio looked like a malfunctioning robot, utterly incapable of engaging in normal human conversation and desperately searching his ROM for the hard-coded talking points his operators had soldered in.
-----
Oh, the humanity! Is Rubio the Hindenburg? No more 3-2-1 blast off.
Post a Comment