In a detailed analysis Tamara Hiler and Lanae Erickson Hatalsk examine how well public colleges and universities have been educating
students. They demonstrate that we have all been conned into thinking that going
to college will guarantee everyone a better job, a higher income and greater
social mobility. (Via Maggie’s Farm)
The authors find that most public institutions of higher learning
fail at their appointed task. Graduation rates are scandalously low, and many
of those who attend these institutions end up with student loan debt they
cannot pay, along with salaries that are roughly equivalent of what they would have
made if they had only graduated from high school.
In the article we see a monumental waste of money and with
many promises betrayed. The authors do not consider how these institutions are
run. They do not examine the role played by bloated administrations and do not
ask whether the teachers know how to teach. They do not explain whether the
students who attend these colleges are simply incapable of doing college level
work or whether the schools themselves have become indoctrination mills.
The authors introduce the topic:
Public colleges and
universities have long been beacons of hope for millions of Americans seeking
to better their lives and improve their economic standing. Each year, they
educate the largest proportion of bachelor’s degree-seeking students (about
two-thirds of the college-going population), often offering a much more
affordable education than their private, non-profit peers. Yet very little is
understood about whether these institutions are actually fulfilling their
promise to serve as engines of mobility for the 6.8 million students that walk
through their doors each year.6 Specifically, how well are our
country’s four-year public colleges and universities equipping students with a
degree and the skills they need to obtain well-paying jobs in our modern
economy?
After analyzing the data, the authors conclude:
Of the
535 four-year public colleges and universities for which data was available, we
found that nearly 6 in 10 are failing to graduate a majority of their
first-time, full-time students, dimming prospects for their future economic
success. In addition, our results reveal that there is a wide divergence of
quality in our public institutions, with the students who need higher education
as an engine of mobility the most often concentrated at schools with the worst
outcomes.
Why does the graduation rate matter?
n
today’s economy, graduation rate is the most powerful indicator of whether or
not a college is truly bringing value to a student’s life. Americans holding
bachelor’s degrees have median weekly earnings that are more than $400 greater
than their non-college educated peers, resulting in lifetime wages that are on
average $1 million more over the course of a lifetime.”13 By
contrast, students who do not earn a diploma are in many cases worse off than
if they had never attended college at all—in large part because most
non-completers will have taken on some form of debt yet will not be eligible
for the higher paying jobs a degree would open up to help pay it off.14
Yet, at
the average public institution, students have LESS THAN a 1 in 2 shot of
graduating.
They continue:
The
graduation rate for first time, full time students at the average four-year
public institution is 48.3%.
At 6 in
10 of these institutions (57.6%), fewer than half of first-time, full-time
students earn a degree.
Only 39
four-year public institutions (7.3%) boast a graduation rate higher than 75%.
We have passed beyond the notion that colleges are diploma
mills. Today’s system of higher education
has produced dropout factories:
A shocking 85% of four-year public colleges and
universities would be considered dropout factories if they were held to the
same standards as our nation’s high schools.
And also:
One of
the more astounding findings in this dataset is the reality that only 80 out of
535 four-year public institutions—or 15.0% of these schools—graduate more than
two-thirds of their first-time, full-time students each year. That means that
if the remaining 455 schools were a part of our country’s K-12 system, they
would be considered “dropout factories” under the recent reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.18 Specifically,
the federal government has recognized that if a high school fails to graduate
more than two-thirds of their students (a status which describes approximately
5% of all high schools in the U.S.) they are required to put in place some sort
of support plan to improve their outcomes or face possible closure.19
And
while low graduation rates are a problem on their own, what is even more
disconcerting is the fact that a number of these institutions have particularly
damaging outcomes for students coming from low- and moderate-income families.
So, the great hope of using the university system to produce
social mobility has been betrayed:
At the average four-year public institution, many
students aren’t earning more than a high school graduate six years after
enrollment.
They conclude that we are not going to fix the problem by making college free.
3 comments:
What should we expect when a large percentage of incoming freshmen must enroll in remedial reading and math? In an earlier age, such individuals would have precipitated out long before filling out college admissions applications, often goaded to do so these days by witless school "counselors" preaching the idiotic "What Color is Your Parachute?" gospel.
We need much more vocational education at the secondary school level. Plumbing, electrical, and finish carpentry can't be offshored, and provide entrepreneurial opportunities.
Ignoring the real problem of students who fail to graduate, looking at career success for specific college graduates is certainly vital information. And seeing which majors work out and which don't as well.
We may be moving to a world where a diploma means nothing, except to those who don't have one. So if its true that the diploma itself is a status symbol to get people in the door for any unrelated career, then the clear plan would seem to be to go to the cheapest options available, like a 2 year community college and then transferring to a university.
But surely many careers will benefit with more direct mentoring within a business, and you're better off starting with low pay in a job with advancement, than low pay plus student debt. I suppose networking is a big key here, knowing someone who knows someone, and that works best when your family has lived in the same place for decades.
And if you get get a foot in the door, Stuart would surely say an 18-20 year old with a good work ethic, good manners, and a willingness to learn will go far where ever he goes. And on the other side, we can wonder what sorts of businesses are looking for young people like that, where being able to work a number of years on low wages is an asset.
A diploma says the holder stuck it out for some years. When businesses can't discriminate on what the candidate can do and bring to the company, it can only ask for a diploma.
Post a Comment