Walter Russell Mead offers some needed perspective on the
Palestinian cause today. Aside from Barack Obama what support does it have in
the world today? And how have the Palestinians been doing in the geographic
areas they control? Is Gaza a laboratory for Palestinian governance?
Mead writes:
The
vote is certainly a propaganda victory for the Palestinian cause, but it does
nothing to help the Palestinians in practical terms. Indeed, a sober look at
the situation suggests that the Palestinians have not been this weak, this
divided or this helpless in many decades. Almost everywhere one looks around
the world, the net effect of the policies of the Obama presidency has been to
undermine the movements and the values that the President hoped to support; the
cause of the Palestinians and the quest for the two state solution are no
exceptions to the rule.
Many people pay lip service to the Palestinian cause. It’s
one of the few remaining ways to be respectably anti-Semitic. And yet, while
Israel advances diplomatically and politically and economically, the
Palestinians are in retreat. The nations of the world have much to gain by
having good relations with Israel. They have nothing to gain by supporting
Palestinian intransigence and Jew-hatred.
Mead summarizes the state of Palestinian support around the
world:
Meanwhile,
the diplomatic success of the very professional and dedicated cadre of
Palestinian representatives and notables who represent Palestinian interests to
the international community has created a strong base of support for
Palestinian aspirations in much of the world. But the last few years have seen
a catastrophic decline in the power of Palestinian allies to affect events on
the ground. The Sunni Arabs, the most natural if always self-interested and
undependable allies of the Palestinian cause, are so weak and divided that they
look to Israel as a defender of the Sunni world against the Persians and the
Shi’a. The European Union has never been less able to exert influence beyond
its frontiers. The incapacity of the United Nations to do anything concrete in
the Middle East has never been more obvious; ask the people of Aleppo how much
of a player the United Nations really is. The end of the Obama administration
would have been a setback for the Palestinians even if Hillary Clinton had been
the next President; with the succession of Donald Trump the United States
appears to be shifting toward a pro-Likud orientation in its Israel policy.
Putin has broken from the Russian tradition of sympathy for the Palestinians;
Erdogan at least for now is prioritizing his need for Israeli support over his
instinctive sympathy for the Palestinians and in any case, his identification with
Hamas threatens to perpetuate rather than to heal Palestinian weakness and
division.
The pro-Palestinian propaganda machine has been hard at work
spinning its great victory at the UN. In the real world, the Palestinian cause
is going down for the count.
4 comments:
Algeria is a mess. Maybe French should have remained and ran things.
Zimbabwe was better white rule too.
What would the world do without Mugabe Money to laugh at?
"Is Gaza a laboratory for Palestinian governance?" If we think "demented kindergartners", may be. They have to do everything wrong, before doing anything right, and they're a long, long, way from everything wrong.
Being run by a kleptocracy of people who hate each other doesn't help, either. Not to mention using their people as cannon fodder or hostages.
Ares may disagree.
I see he hasn't. Maybe he's on vacation.
Post a Comment