In a country where correct opinion seems increasingly to be
defined by stand-up comedians who are not funny, it’s refreshing to read the
words of a true wordsmith, a novelist, no less.
Bret Easton Ellis is best known for a book called American Psycho. As you know, the psycho
in the title is not short for psychotherapist or psychoanalyst. It’s psycho, tout court, for your information.
Anyway said psycho, by name of Patrick Bateman, first came
to fictional life in 1991. I will not recount the story, which was over-the-top gory-- to the point of being cartoonish-- but I will mention, because Ellis wants us to recall it, that Bateman idolized… you guessed it… Donald Trump. I don’t know whether you want
to credit Ellis with prophetic powers and add his name to the list of those who
predicted the rise of Trump, but still….
Having established his bona fides as a man of the political and liberal left, Ellis
is well placed to call out his fellow Hollywood liberals for their mental and moral deficiencies.
This comes to us from a podcast and from Vice:
You can
dislike the fact that Trump was elected, yes, definitely, and yet still
understand and accept ultimately that he was elected this time around. Or you
can have a complete mental and emotional collapse and let the Trump presidency
define you, which I think is absurd. … If you are still losing your s— about
Trump, I think you should probably go to a shrink and not let the bad man that
was elected define your self-victimization and your life. You are letting him
win.
Certainly, it’s a cogent thought. When you define your life by your opposition to Donald Trump you are allowing Donald Trump to define your life.
As Ellis says, this gives Trump yet another victory.
Blaming Trump for your problems, he continues, does not make
you sound very bright:
Barbra
Streisand says she’s gaining weight because of Trump. Lena Dunham says she’s
losing weight because of Trump. Really? You’re blaming the president for your
own problems and neuroses?
Being a resident of the left coast Ellis has a few words for
Meryl Streep. You recall that Streep became a leftist culture hero by
using her speech at the Golden Globes to rant about Trump.
It was very bad form, Ellis replies:
Instead
of talking about all the filmmakers she had worked with and who had passed away
in the last two years — Michael Cimino, Mike Nichols, Nora Ephron, or
especially what it was like playing Carrie Fisher in
‘Postcards From the Edge,’ since Fisher had died just two weeks earlier, Streep
used this moment to go on an anti-Trump rant for 10 minutes on national TV,
instead of eulogizing her friend — again, reinstating the moral superiority of
the left and ignoring aesthetics in place of ideology.
He is quite right to say that it’s all about virtue signaling,
showing off one’s moral superiority. One must add that it’s also about pretending to be intellectually superior.
Vice reports his words:
Ellis
said one of the “morally superior wealthy people” who ruined a recent
dinner with friends by complaining about white male patriarchy lives in a
penthouse on the Upper West Side — “and probably has a net worth of $10 million
dollars.”
And, also:
Liberalism
used to be about freedom but now is about a kind of warped moral authority that
is actually part of the moral superiority movement. This faction of the left is
touchingly now known as ‘The Resistance.’ Oh yes, the resistance. What is this
resistance? There are posters all over my neighborhood in West Hollywood urging
me to resist, resist, resist,” he said.
And:
But
some of us, who did not vote for Trump, and who located exactly who he was
decades ago … some of us have been wondering: Resist what, exactly? And who is
telling us to resist whatever? The people who voted for the candidate who lost
— I’m supposed to listen to them? Is this a joke? … Well I’m certainly
resisting the childish meltdowns I’ve been witnessing at dinners and on social
media and on late night TV and too many times in my own home.”
Childish meltdowns… who knew? Ellis is correct to call out
his Hollywood neighbors for their puerile rants and their pretense of being
intellectual sophisticates.
2 comments:
It seems someone has his head on straight. Be good to have a bunch more.
Probably the correct respond to Donald Trump is the same one Bill Clinton used during W's presidency, "Thanks for the tax cuts, much appreciated."
Is that's the opposite of virtue-signaling?
Maybe now we're back to the 1980s, where conspicuous consumption and status-signaling is the way to be.
The Democrats should just relax and see how long Trump's populism can keep control by being the party that supports tax cuts for the rich and letting the poor eat cake.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/03/republican-governors-trump-budget
Post a Comment