Consistently, the best part of New York Magazine’s Ask Polly
columns are the letters. In yesterday’s column a woman who calls herself Befuddled
Sad Sop explains what happened when she tried to apply a piece of advice that
she gleaned from the therapy culture.
BSS has a friend who has been alienating their mutual
friends by behaving badly while drunk. BSS learned that she should overcome her
tendency to bottle up her emotions. And that openness and honesty makes for a good friend. While her friends are taking their distance
from the bad drunk, BSS decided that she needed to explain it in person, to her
face.
Allow BSS to lay out what she did:
I am
someone who struggles at expressing my emotions and tends to avoid addressing
conflicts. For years, my mouth would clamp shut when it came to feelings. But
I’ve crawled out of that, and lately I’ve made friends with people who are
enthusiastic about talking about emotions and relationships….
I
confronted a friend, and it did not go well. I tried to tell my friend that her
recent behavior while drunk was raising some eyebrows — that various people had
mentioned this to me. This is something I’d want to know if I were in my
friend’s position. Mutual friends have been backing away from this friend, and
even though I think my friend is great, I can also see why some people might
take offense at her harsh personality. My friend sometimes worries about being
disliked but never connects the dots.
I put
off talking to my friend about the drunken incident, but then I received a
pretty passive-aggressive message about it from her, so I asked to talk. After
we talked, my friend sent inflammatory texts to all of those involved. I was
accused of using this as a platform to vent my own hurt. And roll out that
dramarama … the detailed agony is extensive and still ongoing. Immediate lesson
learned? As nice as “true mirrors” sound, maybe not everyone is ready for them.
I felt
I was doing the right thing with someone I was very close to. I still feel this
incident needed to be addressed, but I also feel my lesson here is that I
should have kept my mouth shut and distanced myself from this friend, taking a
clue from others around me. The end result of this has been exponentially more
cataclysmic than keeping my mouth shut.
To give Polly her due, she understands that BSS has made a
mistake. The outcome gives it away. Yet, Polly goes on an extended
rant about herself that we could certainly have lived without. She seems to
want to show BSS that she herself, in her Pollyness, is just as bad a human
being as anyone else… even if she would not have told a friend to her face that
everyone thinks she’s an ugly drunk. Polly seems to want to understand why BSS
did what she did. She wants BSS to face her own issues, even though that is not
what this is about.
Yet, there’s no mystery here. BSS did it because she applied
a principle she learned from the therapy culture, via someone named Rebecca
Solnit:
BSS wrote:
Rebecca
Solnit recently articulated a valuable lesson that I’ve had
to learn: “The opposite of people who drag you down isn’t people who build you
up and butter you up. It’s equals who are generous but keep you accountable,
true mirrors who reflect back who you are and what you are doing.”
Obviously, Solnit’s advice is nuanced. Reflecting someone
back to them, helping them to see how they look to others, is a difficult and
tricky enterprise. Because you have to do it without saying it, without making
them feel attacked. Yet, when BSS told her friend what everyone was saying,
said friend felt immediately attacked and… counterattacked.
Polly continues to suggest that, however badly BSS behaved,
she, Polly still likes her, because she is just like Polly herself. With my
apologies for Polly’s vulgar vocabulary:
And I
love a bitch. I love a cunty complainer who’ll have a drink and complain with
me. I’ve always hated the word cunt, but
I love it lately, because who fucking cares anymore? But I also want to clean
it up. Say “cunt,” clean it up, say “cunt,” clean it up. I’m like a fireman
who’s also an arsonist. I feel more confident and grateful than ever, but I’m
also such a dick and I need some twisted friends in my life who get it, ALL of
it.
Of course, Polly recommends that BSS head off to a therapist
to discover how friendships work. To me this would encourage her to withdraw from
her social circle to deal with her inchoate emotions. She has alienated more
than one friend and would do better to repair some of her
friendships… before it’s too late.
In truth, BSS draws the correct conclusion: she should have
done as her other friends had done and distanced herself from someone whose
behavior has embarrassed the group. One understands the impulse to help, but
the drunken friend did not ask for the help. Perhaps the friend knows how badly
she behaves and even knows how harsh her personality is. If she thinks that she
is the life of the party, the fact that her friends are drifting away and
that she is no longer invited to parties will tell her that she is not seeing
things very clearly. Or perhaps it will not. Perhaps she needs to attend AA meetings.
So, BSS draws the correct conclusion, the conclusion that is
accompanied by remorse for having made a mistake. Polly knows that it’s a
mistake but she lards it over with an intemperate rant, one that we are
supposed to excuse because she was writing on her 47th birthday.
Go figure.
3 comments:
I'm glad I don't do therapy culture.
Stuart: Obviously, Solnit’s advice is nuanced. Reflecting someone back to them, helping them to see how they look to others, is a difficult and tricky enterprise. Because you have to do it without saying it, without making them feel attacked. Yet, when BSS told her friend what everyone was saying, said friend felt immediately attacked and… counterattacked.
It is definitely nuanced. Some people are more sensitive than others, and we're all sensitive about different things. Even when someone asks you your opinion, or your observations on some conflict, you sometimes still have to ask "Do you really want to know?" And at least that warning suggests you should procede with caution before saying yes.
Stuart: In truth, BSS draws the correct conclusion: she should have done as her other friends had done and distanced herself from someone whose behavior has embarrassed the group. One understands the impulse to help, but the drunken friend did not ask for the help.
I agree withdrawing from someone is a common choice, and if you do that consciously, you should be prepared to answer why if the offending person asks. And again, that's where you can tell the truth, and since you've already proven you're willing to retreat the listener has no leverage in return. They can only hear and decide if the feedback is helpful.
The other tricky thing is even if a person acts defensively, even if they counter-attack, it still might be something the offender needs to hear, and she may take a few days, weeks, or months to process, and observe her own behavior before finding some merit.
I don't know if alcohol is a good excuse for a bad drunk, but reduced inhibitions will show things that don't come out otherwise. Even something like recording a drunk person (video, or even taking notes) might help, if you use it not to shame, but just to give the person objective feedback, and allow them to judge themselves when they are sober again. Rationalizations will still be there, but they might have slightly less power.
It does seem like women, being expected to be more agreeable, have more problem with assertiveness, and so it more comes out as aggressiveness, like drunken rants, and yet there's a different sort of drunkenness in self-righteousness, those moments where you're sure the other person is in the wrong, and you can judge them harshly as "tough love", especially if you're not ready to hear the same in return.
So she goes and says "other people have been talking about you blab, blab, blab". What a weasel. If you're going to say something say "I think etc, etc" and accept the consequences of your statement to whomever it is.
Post a Comment