This is not good news for the therapy business. At least,
for those who provide the cognitive-behavioral treatments that have now been
shown to be the most effective in treating a variety of mental health issues.
A recent study has shown that a patient can do just as well
using a self-help book or a computer program. Since cognitive therapy is about
retraining the mind through an exercise program, it makes some sense that the
person of the therapist does not much matter.
Olivia Goldhill reports on the research:
Seeking
out the perfect therapist can feel as significant and difficult as finding a
romantic partner. A study on the effectiveness of trained therapists versus
self-help treatment, though, suggests that therapists are not as important as
they seem.
A
meta-analyses of 15 studies, published in
this month’s volume of Administration
and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, found
no significant difference in the treatment outcomes for patients who saw a
therapist and those who followed a self-help book or online program.
The
researchers, led by Robert King, psychology professor at Queensland University
of Technology in Australia, evaluated the outcomes of 723 patients who were
treated for a variety of mental health conditions, including anxiety, PTSD,
OCD, and depression.
All 15
studies involved a form of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) treatment, and
patient outcomes were evaluated by various mental health diagnostic scales,
rather than self-assessment.
Contrary
to the researchers’ hypothesis that therapists would provide stronger results
(though with greater variability), the results showed that therapists were
neither more effective nor more variable than self-help options.
As soon as the world’s therapists get over gnashing their
teeth, they can also see these results as a confirmation of the fact that their
treatment is more scientific. After all, when you receive a medical treatment,
does it matter whether it is administered by Dr. X or Dr. Y or Nurse Z. If the
effect of the treatment depended on the person of the provider, it would be
less about science and more about… a placebo.
Of course, there are other forms of psychotherapy. I try to
follow them on this blog, especially those that appear weekly in New York
Magazine. Those are Ask Polly and Lori Gottlieb. The so-called insights
offered in these two columns are occasionally correct, but they are more often
off the mark. With Polly, in particular, a former therapy patient seems compelled to offer up her own experience, with therapy and in life, as a
means to show the proper amount of empathy for the letter writer.
I find this to be an especially useless technique, an
admission that the columnist cannot get out of her mind to focus on
the letter writer’s problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment