I find this all to be more than passing strange. Canadian
journalist Isabel Vincent, a woman who has written several books based on real
events, especially real crimes, criticizes French novelist Leila Slimani
for having written a novel based on a real event.
Slimani’s novel, The
Perfect Nanny is about to appear in English translation. It has already
been a sensation in France, garnering the author important prizes and massive
sales. The book takes its “inspiration,” if you want to call it that, from a New
York murder case. A nanny entrusted with the care of two small children from the Krim family... up and
murdered both of them one day.
Vincent offers her misguided opinion:
Leila
Slimani’s novel “The
Perfect Nanny” has become a global bestseller, winning critical acclaim for
its young Moroccan-French author. It’s a well-told tale written in sparse,
economical prose — a gripping read that hit US shelves last week.
But its
premise left me cold, partly because Slimani, writing from her Parisian aerie,
capitalized on a real-life New York family’s actual horror — the bloody and
senseless murder of two young children.
Slimani,
36, said she was inspired by the horrific deaths of Lucia and Leo Krim, the two
young children who were found stabbed in the blood-soaked bathtub of their
well-appointed Upper West Side apartment a few days before Halloween in 2012.
Their nanny, Yoselyn Ortega, was charged with their murder, and her trial could
begin shortly after her next court appearance on Jan. 22.
Note the word choice. Vincent, who writes about crime
stories, accuses Slimani of having capitalized on a murder. If Slimani had reported the facts of the case-- instead of having written a novel-- would that have meant that she was or was not capitalizing.
Vincent notes
that the novel does not directly report the events, but takes inspiration from
them… much as an artist might draw a cityscape or a landscape or a true crime story or the image of
Kronos devouring one of his sons. For the record, the last was by Francisco
Goya.
The statement is completely ignorant. While Vincent mumbles
something about how novelists should be free to write about what they please,
she has accused a novelist of exploiting grief for personal gain. Might one say
that same about any journalist who covers bad news or of any artist who creates
a work based on a horrific crime?
Apparently, Vincent is especially upset that Slimani has
made a lot of money from writing her
novel. Slimani also now advises President Macron on literary matters.
Therefore, Vincent, self-appointed armchair psychiatrist,
believes that Slimani should feel guilty for profiting from someone else’s
tragedy.
And yet, Slimani did not write about the tragedy directly. She reset it in Paris. She was
inspired, if that is the word, by the tragedy. Vincent is still upset by it
all:
Does
she feel any guilt for benefiting from such a painful event?
Slimani
shrugged off the question and said she was focused on the relationship of the
nanny with the professional couple — Myriam and Paul — in the novel. She claims
only to have used the Krim tragedy as a jumping off point for her book.
But the
fictional characters are eerily similar to real life. Although the setting is
Paris’ elegant 9th Arrondissement in May instead of Manhattan in October, the
fictional professional couple treat Louise, their middle-aged nanny, in much
the same way the Krims did — with great care, taking her on a family vacation
and bragging to friends that they had hired the modern equivalent of Mary
Poppins.
So what. What if they are similar to real life. Slimani is a
novelist. She has what we call artistic license. The story was compelling and
she made it into what is apparently a very good book Shouldn’t we praise her
accomplishment rather than resent it?
Why don’t women support other women? Why does a woman who
writes about real life tragedies attack another woman for writing a novel about
a real life tragedy? Is it all about book sales and material success?
Or is it simply the fact that Slimani is also young and beautiful?
5 comments:
Undertakers, they're the worst
Truman Capote, call your office.
from the original article:
"Novelists are free to write about whatever they want, but is there a moral responsibility here? Should Slimani perhaps donate even a small part of her profits to the Lulu and Leo Fund, the foundation the Krims set up to help other families and to honor the memory of their slain children?"
a public donation might open up the author to a lawsuit for defamation or invasion of privacy. intellectual property law is tricky. that's why there's the usual disclaimer in fiction, "a disclaimer: “This is a work of fiction. All characters and incidents are products of the author’s imagination and any resemblance to actual people or events is coincidental or fictionalized.” The closer the author identifies to the real people or events (such as a public donation to the Krims), the more danger of a suit.
otherwise, the Post article seems like an instance of professional jealousy or virtue signaling, in other words, a catfight.
Thank you for clarifying the legal aspect of the issue!
I take it other readers of this column will think this: "Damn! She thought of that before I did! I am sooooooo angry!
Post a Comment