I have on occasion commented
favorably about the advice offered by Washington Post columnist Carolyn Hax. I mention this so you know that I am fair and balanced.
Yet, today, Hax does considerable damage to her reputation for clear-eyed
judgment by her response to a woman who is unhappy about some of the life
choices that her boyfriend’s daughter, Becca, is taking.
Becca, you see, is a woman of her
time. While reading this excerpt from the letter, I would request, ever so politely,
that you consider whether or not the behavior of an army of Beccas has anything
to do with the proliferation of sexual harassment. For anyone who has reached
the age of adult reason, Becca does not respect herself. She is hellbent on
endangering her moral being and her life. Apparently, no one cares. Not only does Carolyn Hax not care; she is cheering Becca on.
Here is an excerpt from the letter:
I’m struggling with keeping an open mind about
Len’s daughter, “Becca.” While Becca is beautiful and smart, she is also, for
someone in her early 20s, opinionated, sarcastic and very open about her sex
life. She describes herself as “aromantic” (i.e. not interested in anything
long term with men), which I would find equally unacceptable if she were male.
She couldn’t be more different from my daughters, and while I know that’s her
right, I find myself silently judging her choices all of the time. She also
engages in risky sports like rock- and ice-climbing, which do worry Len a lot
but she doesn’t let that bother her at all.
Silently Judging
Obviously, Becca is in trouble.
Becca is about to get herself into much more trouble. She acts as though she is
fearless but she has moved beyond risk taking. If she was so happy with her
lifestyle choices, why is she indulging in potentially suicidal behavior.
If she is open and honest and shameless about her sexual behavior, she should
not be surprised that some of today’s young men treat her accordingly.
If Becca's peers all approve of her behavior
they are inviting men to treat them as vulgar tarts. Please excuse the foul language.
One understands, and one
emphasizes-- for those who do not understand-- that Becca has been brainwashed by
our culture. She is allowing herself to be pimped out by her feminist
godmothers.
What does Carolyn Hax have to
say? Well, Hax thinks that Becca is utterly and totally great.
She writes:
Wait a
minute. Fully grown Becca shouldn’t climb because her daddy doesn’t like it?
She should commit to a man long term even though she’s not interested (and
these unions are wretched, regardless of whether a man or woman forces them)?
She can be opinionated and sarcastic, but only if it stops by her early 20s?
I’d
take a hundred Beccas over one more 1955.
You
don’t have to love her or even enjoy her company, but please at least
recognize:
How
badly the world needs its Beccas and other characters. How your own daughters
today reap the benefits of the fearless Beccas of yesterday.
How
boring the world would be if all the Beccas were shamed into hiding by people
who think brassiness is just a failure of breeding and taste.
How
unseemly it is to judge others, period, whose chief offense is to be different
from you, as if the superiority of your way is a given.
Again —
don’t like her? Okay. Your prerogative. She may well have crossed the line
anyway between being her badass self and seeking attention for it. But that’s
not what you’ve cited here, and not what you’re judging.
What
you find distasteful about Becca all sounds like a 2018 remix of, so help me,
her not acting like a lady. And the remedy for judging is to internalize how
wrong it is to judge.
The girl is putting herself into danger. And Hax can feel nothing but contempt for women who want to act more like ladies, who want to be treated with courtesy and respect.
Becca is acting like she has no self-respect. And Hax thinks that
the letter writer, an older woman, mother to her own grown daughters, is being
judgmental. When women are out marching against sexual harassment, committed by progressive, feminist men, you should ask yourself where they ever got
the idea that their crude, lewd and rude—not to mention criminal—attempts to
pick up girls would be received positively.
Obviously, a man who crosses a line crosses a line. A man
who commits a crime commits a crime. No one is against punishing those that do.
And yet, punishing men for their bad behavior is not the same thing as changing
the culture in order to ensure that this does not happen. When you try to
control behavior with threats of punishment you numb men’s moral sense and
induce them to think, not about the right way to treat women, but of what they can
get away with.
And yet, by absolving women of responsibility for their
behavior, for telling them that they can do anything they please, we are saying that when
bad things happen, the fault is never theirs. Since we do not want to write
this into a crime-punishment narrative, we would assert that women have an
important say in how they are seen and treated by other people. For all the screeching about how women must have a say in the way they live their lives, this new amorality tells them that they have no say in the way they are treated. The rule also applies to men. If you want people to respect you, show by your
appearance and your language that you respect yourself.
Hax wants everyone to shut up about Becca’s bad behavior.
Because if you can control everyone’s mind the behavior will become less bad.
And yet, Becca’s moral sense, however dormant, knows that
she is being manipulated into taking extremely risky behavior. So she doubles
down on risk and is overdosing on cheap thrills. Have you considered that the chemical rush she receives from such semi-suicidal activities serves to dull her moral sense, her sense of shame. Even if Hax and our moral
guardian class can convince the world not to judge Becca, one of these days,
her father’s girlfriend suspects, the ice cliffs will judge Becca.
It will be a sad day for Becca, for her father, for her
father’s girlfriend. Hopefully it will be a wake-up call for Carolyn Hax and anyone else who
has been encouraging the Beccas of this world.
15 comments:
I could care less what this woman does. Being stupid is not against the law, contrary to what some people think.
“Hax and our moral guardian class can convince the world not to judge...“
This perfectly summarizes the ridiculousness of our self-congratulatory, morally magnificent betters: they can claim to offer advice without judging — which is impossible — and simultaneously claim others ought not judge, for their own moral and ethical betterment.
And then, her advice: (a) women do not need men — daddys and all; and (b) women are not responsible — society tries to seize their power.
Patently, self-evidently absurd.
You go, girl! Oprah 2020!
I agree with James. Who cares? Darwin's got it.
It isn't about whether we care... the problem is that no one cares... her father only cares about the ice rock climbing. And, it matters that we have a younger generation producing social chaos and contributing to the proliferation of sexual harassment.
Stuart,
The people involved in this (father, family, etc) are the ones who should care, but they do not know what caring is. What they think is caring is in my opinion merely self-regard, hence the no one cares. I care what this woman will do, but I do not feel it is my place to intervene in any way (that is to my reference about the law) The Left is using "caring" for the purposes of tyranny, subversion of the law, and just general subjugation. By this means they have produced the generation you speak of and of which I can do little except refuse to change myself from what I believe to be right. I might be wrong (I usually am), but I feel that way and am prepared to take the consequences.
I should add are the ones who should care and act accordingly.
Of course it "matters", Schneiderman. I'm not disputing that a generation has been raised to reject the collective and hard-earned wisdom of human history. Unfortunately, it can't be unfucked, even by intrepid voices in the wilderness like yours. Institutions have been fully colonized by purveyors of Progressivism, a disease of the so-called "Enlightenment", to the point that today one can buy tiny rubber penises for their daughters to wear so they can stand up and pee at urinals when "identifying" as boys. Women can dress like whores and demand that no one notice, and the freakish traitor, pardoned by our President, Chadley "Man"ning, is running for the US Senate in Maryland (and I, for one, hope it wins; faster, please).
There is no going back from this. Pearl-clutching nostrums about civility and reason from the Pecksniff branch of conservatism utterly failed to actually conserve anything and, in fact, contributed to the demise of the West. A smidgen of smashmouth, as routinely practiced by the less-restrained and victorious opposition, would, even if not successful, at least have been cathartic. The hell with it. Let 'er burn.
Judgment is a tool. It helps you separate the good from the bad. It's a tragedy that we spread this message of "don't judge".
The good news here is that the Beccas of the world will eliminate themselves from the gene pool, either through their risky behavior but more likely as a result of their failure to breed. The future belongs to the Duggars, the Romneys, and yes, the Trumps.
One of the Duggar spawn molested five underage girls, including four of his sisters.
I'm mixed about my reaction to Becca. Many of her traits sound repugnant but there is not enough information to know whether she is being careless with her life.
I don't have any experience ice climbing but I do know a little about rock climbing. Rock climbing is a fun sport which is enjoyed by many people who are very safety conscious. None of the climbers I have known have been seriously injured or killed. Of course there are others who climb very difficult routes without ropes who are taking much greater risks.
Judgment is a tool. It helps you separate the good from the bad. It's a tragedy that we spread this message of "don't judge" - whitney
There's an older phrase that makes the point rather well:
"(so and so) doesn't use good judgement"...(usually seen easily in the consequences of their choices and actions.)
- shoe
Illuninati, there's gulf between a hold-my-beer moment and the train wreck Becca has made of her life.
Jack Fisher, at least there WAS a Duggar spawn. Are you saying that children shouldn't be born because of the risk that something like this might happen?
Ses, let's put this in perspective and view this situation with as much charity as possible. The asshatted cocksucking mofo Duggan who molested the girls was himself a child, meaning the primary responsibility for his crimes lies with the parents. There are what, 19 kids? This isn't a family, it's a circus, and if someone told me there's a look-at-me grab for attention in this sideshow, I'm not one to deny it. There's no earthly way that this Duggan creep got sufficient parental attention or supervision to teach him to keep his filthy hands to himself.
Someone ought to bitchslap some sense into these people.
Post a Comment