The system failed. It failed the children of Parkland, FL
and it failed Nikolas Cruz. We know that the FBI was asleep, that the sheriff’s
office was derelict in its duty and that no one has yet to take responsibility
for the failure. If Sheriff Scott Israel had any sense of decency he would long
since have resigned his position. Instead, he is hunkering down and defending
himself… because he wasn’t on the scene. Of course, he is still responsible for
his department. But apparently, he does not feel that way. And our morally
twisted culture refuses to hold him accountable in the court of public opinion.
Today, we have another piece of the puzzle. It turns out
that Nikolas Cruz consulted with several psychiatrists and therapists over a
two year period. He was taking psychiatric medication… though I do not know
which one. Now, the Miami Herald has gained access to the psychiatric files and
reports on them.
The signs were clear enough, and the psychiatrists did
everything short of having Cruz committed. They saw his paranoid and violent
tendencies. They knew that he was threat. They seemed to believe that he was
responding to treatment. But they had not seen him in two years. Between then and now, his violent and erratic and paranoid behavior
had gotten worse. The sheriff’s department was called to his home dozens of
time. And yet, no one thought to send him back to treatment… or to have
evaluated.
Cruz was a problem in 2014, when he was attending what is
called an “alternative school.” He had confided in a psychiatrist that he
wanted to kill people, but he told the therapist that he didn’t really mean it.
The therapist wanted Cruz to talk it out— the old talking cure, don’t you know— which
the Miami Herald disparages:
A May
3, 2014, notation in a Broward County schools psychiatric file said Cruz
“reported [a dream] last week of him killing people and covered in blood. He
smiled and told the therapist that sometimes he says things for shock value.”
After
Cruz’s disclosure to his therapist at the alternative Cross Creek School,
administrators developed a “safety plan” to ensure the welfare of Cruz and
others while the teen was on summer vacation. The plan included provisions for
removing “all sharp objects from the home,” and encouraging the youth to
“verbalize what the problem is.”
If
talking about “the problem” was seen as a solution to Cruz’s volatile behavior
— and, in the short term, it may have been — it did not last.
What did the treating therapists see?
Cruz
alternated between periods of good behavior and periods of paranoia during
which he acted out at school and at home, making fun of his peers, cursing at
school staff and making threats, according to notes from his period at Cross
Creek. The records obtained by The Herald documented weekly therapy sessions
between February 2014 and December of 2015.
Cruz wanted to own a gun. One therapist was concerned:
School
administrators spoke with Lynda Cruz in the months that followed about their
mutual concerns about Cruz’s desire to own a gun and take shooting lessons. The
therapist, a Sept. 23, 2014, notation said, “shared concerns with parent about
his obsession with guns/military and his poor anger control. The note also
cited concerns over the possibility that Cruz would “deploy aggressive
behaviors at home.”
Another therapist recommended that Cruz be allowed to have a
gun if he could earn it:
At the
time, Lynda Cruz was considering buying the teen a pellet gun for his birthday.
A different therapist who appears to have been visited the family at their home
suggested the mom develop a “plan” in which the youth would be allowed to buy a
gun if he was able to “earn it” with good behavior. There was “a plan in place
at home in order to control his use of the pellet gun.”
Another therapist was opposed:
Cruz’s
school therapist, however, expressed reservations. “Parent was advised against
getting him a gun (pellet) or classes for his birthday,” the September notation
said. “Parent advised to restrict access to any weapon.”
Another therapist tried role-playing as a way to ease Cruz’s
transition into the more normal high school, Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High:
In some
sessions, the therapist described Cruz as “receptive,” or noted that he’d had
“positive” behavior at school. The therapist role-played with Cruz to teach him
how to interact with his peers and avoid conflict. But following other
sessions, the therapist noted troubling behavior at school and at home.
In one
April 2014 session, the therapist discussed Cruz’s “aggressive behavior at home
due to his not getting his way.” Cruz responded by saying that he saw the
therapist as a threat. The therapist noted that Cruz was “very paranoid.”
Before the 2014 summer vacation, Cruz’s therapist and
psychiatrist wrote to another of the boy’s psychiatrists, to express their
serious concerns:
In
preparation for a summer 2014 recess, Cruz’s school therapist and psychiatrist
jointly wrote a letter to another one of the teen’s psychiatrists articulating
a host of serious concerns. “At home, he continues to be aggressive and
destructive with minimal provocation,” the letter said. “For instance, he
destroyed his television after losing a video game that he was playing. Nikolas
has a hatchet that he uses to chop up a dead tree in his backyard. Mom has not
been able to locate that hatchet as of lately.
“When
upset he punches holes in the walls and has used sharp tools to cut up the
upholstery on the furniture and carve holes in the walls of the bathroom,” the
letter added.
One notes that Cruz was treated by multiple therapists. And
that some of them were clearly alarmed.
But then, they seemed to believe that Cruz had improved
significantly. We do not know whether this had anything to do with his
medication and we do not know what the medication was. We do not know whether
he continued to take his medication after entering Stoneman Douglas. We suspect that he did not:
By the
following April, though, after Cruz had shown “tremendous progress” in his
behavior, Cross Creek began efforts to move him to a traditional school.
Psychiatric
notes from that period describe a significantly less erratic youth. His mother
reported that he was making friends and had exhibited no signs of inappropriate
behavior “in the community. She is happy that he has been doing better,” an
April 28, 2015, notation said.
Cruz
had been able to “control” his behavior, both in school and at home, the April
28, 2015 notation said. He was noticeably less aggressive. Teachers did not
report having to place him in “time outs.”
“Parent
has requested student to be mainstreamed,” the report added.
In
discussions about Cruz’s desire to attend a “regular” school, psychiatric
progress notes said he was encouraged to continue mental health medication,
therapy and social work case-management at home, and was discouraged from
becoming a cadet: “Interested in ROTC?,” the report said. “Not advised,” it
added.
One does not know whether Cruz received any treatment after
he enrolled in his new high school. We suspect that he responded well to
medication, but then stopped taking it. Within the scope of their influence
the psychiatrists do seem to have done as well as they could by Nikolas Cruz… but then he
stopped treatment and the problem became the sheriff’s and the FBI’s.
3 comments:
In some states, like California, a psychiatrist has a duty to warn (that is, breaching psych - client confidentiality) if there is a threat to third parties. Patient confidentiality is a matter of huge, huge importance.
In other states like Florida, this isn't a duty, but the decision is left to the psych. Here is part of the Florida statute allowing disclosure:
"(2) Such patient has made an actual threat to physically harm an identifiable victim or victims; and
(3) The treating psychiatrist makes a clinical judgment that the patient has the apparent capability to commit such an act and that it is more likely than not that in the near future the patient will carry out that threat, the psychiatrist may disclose patient communications to the extent necessary to warn any potential victim or to communicate the threat to a law enforcement agency."
From what I've read, the threats were too vague and distant in time to allow the psychs to inform LEO. The failure is in how the law is written. There have been efforts to change this.
Fla. Statutes Title XXIII 456.059
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0400-0499/0456/Sections/0456.059.html
Post a Comment