Reginald has a problem. He wants to divorce his wife. He
does not even understand why he ever married her. They have a daughter who is
apparently a teenager. He and his wife do not get along. They had agreed to
divorce. But now, his wife is seriously ill. She has a heart condition, a
side-effect of her pregnancy. She has changed her mind about divorce. He has
not changed his. He writes to therapist Lori Gottlieb to ask whether he can
dump his dying wife… or some such.
He fears that his actions will make him look like a jerk.
The chances are very good that such actions will make him look worse than that.
We know little about how the child feels, about how family and friends feel,
about how his community will see him. What about work colleagues and the wives
of male friends. If we are allowed to
speculate about the minds of other people, we would suggest that his daughter,
his family and his community will hold it seriously against him. His fishing
buddies might not much care, but I am confident that their wives will. And his
daughter will certainly care. She will be assailed on a daily basis by the
plaints of a dying mother whose husband has abandoned her.
In short, and without too much suspense, he should not
divorce his sick and dying wife. Without knowing anything about his social
network, we will err on the side of caution and declare that people should
never abandon dying spouses… regardless. The damage to his reputation will not
be repairable. His relationship with his daughter will not be repairable. Even
if her parents do not get along very well, his daughter will almost certainly
take her mother’s side.
For now, here are some salient excerpts from the letter:
We both
could make a case for why we should have never gotten married. We broke up and
got back together several times prior to marrying. I even married someone else
(the marriage lasted approximately one year, and I could write a separate
letter about that one!), and I was engaged to someone else before our paths
crossed again and we married.
Two
years later, after the birth of our only daughter together (I have an older
child with another woman), my wife was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy
(enlargement of the heart), which doctors believe happened during her
pregnancy. It caused some valve damage that she needed surgery to repair, and
she later had additional surgery to implant a pacemaker.
Her
health stabilized, but the issues we had prior to getting married worsened. I
told myself going into 2019 that I would ask for a divorce for the sake of both
our happiness. But toward the end of 2018, her heart issues started to get
worse. So when I asked for a divorce, she accused me of leaving because she's
sick. Fortunately, I had a bulleted list of all the things that were not
getting better—and she didn’t disagree with the plethora of issues I laid out.
We
mutually agreed that we should get a divorce, but a week or so later her health
took a turn for the worse. Now her cardiologist says that she may have to have
another heart surgery or even a transplant. As much as I’m concerned for her, I
have been through thick and thin with her through prior surgeries and sometimes
long bouts of her not being at 100 percent, and I know I can no longer stay. I
will pick up the slack where I need to for my daughter, and my wife has a great
support system with immediate family, but I don't want to come off as a jerk.
Am I
wrong to leave her under the circumstances?
Reginald
Since Gottlieb is a therapist, she sees this as a
relationship problem. She cannot, from her therapist’s perspective tell him
whether it’s right or wrong to leave his wife:
I can’t
tell you whether you’re wrong to leave your wife, but I can help you understand
your decision better by examining the story you’re telling yourself.
In truth, it’s far more wrong than right. Reginald would have
done better to write to the New York Times Ethicist columnist.
Gottlieb meanders into some thought experiments. There she
considers how other people might see his situation. Again, she has no real notion
of the man’s social networks and things that all other people will either feel
for him or not feel for him. She has no sense of community moral values. Hers is simply the wrong way to look at the problem:
Now, if
you were hearing this story as an outsider, would you shake your head and say,
“Oh, this poor, long-suffering man! Look at all the hardship he’s been
through—all these women have wreaked havoc on his well-being, and I hope he can
save himself and go find true love once and for all”? Or might you say, “Oh,
this man sounds so confused. He’s clearly suffering, but he also seems to
struggle with maintaining a stable, intimate relationship. I’m worried for his
future well-being—no matter what he decides to do”?
And then, unfortunately, she decides that she must delve
into his personal history. To be fair, he invited her to do so, but it’s still
not relevant:
For
starters, you say that you don’t want to come off as a jerk, but consider: This
probably isn’t the first time a woman you were partnered with thought that you
acted like a jerk.
The problem is not whether or not he looks like a jerk. He
is not dumping a girlfriend or even divorcing a woman… both of which are
generally accepted forms of social behavior. He is talking about walking out on
a sick and dying woman who also happens to be the mother of his child. The situation is
unique, for him. We should not muddy the waters by confusing it with prior history.
Again, Gottlieb believes that it’s a relationship problem:
The
part of your story that seems to stand out for its accuracy is that you aren’t
leaving your wife because of her illness—at least, not completely. Given your
history and the way you told your story, my guess is that you’ve found it hard
to stay in any relationship, illness or not, and that you’ll continue to do so
if you don’t figure out why relationships are so challenging for you.
So, Gottlieb falls into the trap that has caught so many
therapists. She thinks that it’s about empathy. And, of course, about
constructing a narrative, that is, turning your real life into fiction.
… shift
from seeing the story solely within the confines of a first-person perspective
(I’m not happy; I’ve put up with a lot)
to being able to see it as a more balanced, third-person narrator (This mother is undergoing something
life-altering, and has been for more than a decade, and probably hasn’t gotten
much help for the trauma that resulted from her pregnancy. This daughter’s life
has been affected by having a sick mother and parents who don’t get along. This
husband and father has some personal issues to work out so that he can have
healthier relationships). As you rework your story, you’ll develop more
empathy for the other characters in the narrative, and be able to see the plot
from their points of view as well.
Life is not a story. Telling it like a story will not help
you to understand anything. The issue here is moral values, something that this
man has an inkling of. Asking a therapist for advice about moral issues is
obviously a big mistake, but not as big a mistake as abandoning a dying woman, the
mother of your child.
4 comments:
As long as the writer and the therapist are working out of the idea that personal happiness is the greatest good, anything can be justified. It is a morality, just not a traditional one. It is that core principle that they need to reexamine. If he could see a different moral value as a greater good, love for his child and compassion for his desperately ill wife, for example, and see that this is where life has lead to, his decision making would be different.
There's a reason the old standard vows had "in sickness and in health." There's also a reason the old standard vows don't give you an out clause. It says "As long as we both shall live", not "As long as we are both happy."
What this man has is a minuscule droplet of an inkling that he's about to do a bad thing.
Duty isn’t meant to be comfortable. I hold out hope that right and wrong might stage a comeback soon. Good and evil can’t be far behind.
You know what showed him for what he is? When he said he was "willing" to "pick up the slack" with his daughter...in other words, not really his job, but since he's a good guy, he'll "help" his dying wife a little with HER job of raising THEIR daughter.
That right there showed who he was. And I think he just said that to prove to the people he tells this story to, that he's really A Good Guy; he's not leaving 'cos he's A Bad Guy -- after all, he's willing to....etc. etc.
He thought he was making himself look good and easing some of his guilt with that remark, but it showed us who he is really well.
Post a Comment