Posts
It is not going to come as a surprise, but you cannot transform a penis into a vagina surgically. The notion of gender-affirming care is simply a euphemism for a form of mutilation. While top surgery, that is, double mastectomies, are doable, transforming a penis into a vagina-- gingerly called bottom surgery-- is impossible.
Those who have it done know this, only too well. Thanks be to the Daily Mail for reporting the results of a survey of people who have undergone it. They have been consigned to a life of pain and suffering. To say that they have affirmed something is a rank absurdity.
Anyway, here is the report:
More than half of trans women who have 'bottom' surgery are in so much pain a year later they need medical attention, a study suggests.
Up to a third of patients also struggled to use the toilet or suffered sexual issues 12 months after the operation, which sees patients transitioning from male to female given a surgically constructed vagina.
Researchers from the Women's College Hospital (WCH) in Ontario, Canada, analyzed the medical records of 80 patients who sought care from the clinic between three months and five years after having the operation.
Campaigners say the findings demonstrate that complex surgeries like vaginoplasty often carry risks that patients are unaware of - despite a dramatic uptick in the number of gender reconstruction surgeries performed annually in the US.
If this were any other form of surgery, it would long since have been banned. Regrettably, in our gaslit age is it called “gender affirming.”
1 comment:
The tip off is the dainty euphemism. That's how we know the Left is ashamed of something that is being promoted. Bottom surgery sounds like the patient may have a perianal abscess or hemorrhoids. Dickectomy is closer to the truth or pseudo-vaginal construction. Calling it gender-affirming surgery is as misleading and inappropriate as calling it genital mutilation.
Post a Comment