Stuart Schneiderman
About Me
Posts
Donate to this blog via Paypal.
Labels
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(597)
-
▼
July
(46)
- America's New Ruling Class
- Is Higher Education Worth It?
- Slut-Shaming
- Can You Fight Your Way to a Happy Marriage?
- Jaclyn Friedman Proclaims Herself a Slut
- Finding Her Inner Slut
- So Long, Citizen of the World
- What's the Matter with California?
- Stop Bad-Mouthing Your Husband
- A Mosque at Ground Zero? Part 2
- Why Do Women Cheat?
- The Italian Work Ethic
- The Left's Identity Crisis
- A Mosque at Ground Zero?
- The Obama Perplex
- Phyllis Chesler, At War Against Islamic Terror
- "I'm Not Here to Make Friends"
- Should We Pray for Christopher Hitchens?
- Will Obama Bomb Iran?
- Who Plugged the Gulf Oil Gusher?
- Burqaphilia
- Stalemate
- "Just the Facts, Ma'am."
- First in Internet Porn Searches
- Are Bad Table Manners Ruining Your Marriage?
- Is Obama Anti-Business?
- "The Marine Corps as Psychotherapy"
- Palin and the Feminists
- The Drill Sergeant's Untherapy
- Bob Newhart and the Untherapy
- When Good Parents Have Bad Children
- Moral Depravity in America
- No title
- Helicopter Moms
- Sarah Palin's First Ad
- What Matters More in a Relationship: Hot Sex or Lo...
- Unemployed Millennials
- Feel Goodism at NASA
- Exercising Your Mind
- Are They Coming for Your Freedom?
- Friendship
- The Hotness Gap
- The Al Gore Rhythm Method
- How Do You Know When You Are Getting It Wrong?
- The Feminist View of Al Gore
- Hephzibah Anderson Is Chastened
-
▼
July
(46)
3 comments:
The Times is no mystery. Just consider the demographics of its employees, including the publisher.
They're just voting their gender preferernces.
The answer is to get the government out of our bedrooms. How is it that government came to be the controlling authority on marriage? I don't believe any of the founding fathers needed a government license to marry.
Long term intact heterosexual unions are the most efficient means of reproducing and raising offspring. That is rational.
Homosexual unions are only equivalent to heterosexual ones that are childless, more specifically those that do not want children. Many childless couples want children, and the phenomena of becoming pregnant after adopting a child is well known.
If marriage only involved two people, or if love produces children (not biology), then homosexual relationships would be equivalent to heterosexual ones.
I am not sure government does not have a role in marriage because of the issue of private property division (both material and minor children).
Post a Comment