If you keep abreast of the pseudo-scholarship you would
think that the dread male gaze is programmed to objectify women by reducing
them to the sum of their body parts.
It does make intuitive sense that men are more likely to
check out a woman’s mammary region, her gluteal musculature, the curve of her
hip and her shapely gams.
Men are naturally drawn to bodily cues that signal
fertility.
It is more difficult to explain that, given the choice,
women are more likely to want to gaze at women than at men.
Apparently, human nature has not heard the news about gender
parity.
Now, a study from the University of Bristol in Great Britain
has thrown these assumptions into question. By studying involuntary eye
movements the researchers have shown that when a male and a female heterosexual
are shown an image of a woman, the man is more likely to look more intently at
the woman’s face, while the woman is more likely to will look away from her face to gaze at her
body.
If your face is your social identity—the way other people
know who you are—then the person who looks more intently at the woman’s face is
the one who endows her with more humanity.
That would be the man. He seems to have the greater desire
to get to know her as a human being. So much for the claptrap about the male gaze.
The results are open to different interpretations.
The researchers suggest that women are less likely to look
someone in the eye because direct eye-contact, especially the kind that fixates
on a face, is considered to be threatening.
Being weaker, most women do not go around threatening other
people, either male or female.
I would add that when a woman looks slightly down and away,
it can also be considered flirtatious. Women modify their gaze in order to
attract attention.
News reports on the research have suggested that women tend
to ogle other women because they are checking out the competition. If women see
other women as threats, or as potential enticements for their men they pay
special attention to the body regions that they imagine men will find most
alluring.
It seems equally probable that when a woman looks over
another woman she is studying her outfit. Women’s attire is far more complex
than men’s. Putting together an outfit, to say nothing of a look requires considerable time and effort and work.
A woman takes more time examining another woman’s outfit
because she wants to know how it was put together.
A man, on the other hand, will be less interested in how it goes on and more interested in how it comes off.
4 comments:
Perhaps a woman's perspective is motivated by perceiving other women as competing interests. Perhaps men follow the same process, but of other men, and for the same reason.
Perhaps men do not obsess with women on a regular basis, because there is a limit to our desire, and once our desire is satiated, we do not perceive women as equipotent competing interests.
The motivation for this behavior may be risk assessment and mitigation. After all, life is an exercise in risk management.
"A man, on the other hand, will be less interested in how it goes on and more interested in how it comes off."
CLASSIC!
I am reminded of the "Two Pickets to Tittsburg" joke. Men can be distracted by female flesh.
Post a Comment