A cynic might imagine that Betty Friedan’s extended screed
on “the feminine mystique” was yet another battle in the ongoing culture war
between the pretty girls and the not-so-pretty girls.
Mystique or not, femininity is real. It is associated with
fertility. Men value it. Women seek to project it.
Naomi Wolf notwithstanding, femininity is associated with
beauty, and with characteristics that can be measured. It is no more a myth
than it was a mystique.
For all the feminist caterwauling it appears that men still associate
femininity with beauty. And yet, there is a limit. Recent studies have shown a direct correlation
between what men find to be attractive in women and the overall healthiness of
a nation.
In a nation that enjoys generally good health men are more
likely to find more feminine women more attractive. In a nation that suffers
generally bad health men are more likely to find more masculine looking women
more attractive.
Surprisingly, it’s not just about the health of an individual.
It involves the general health of the nation, the group, the community.
Moreover, it does not correlate with the ratio of men to
women.
The Economist reports:
THAT
health and beauty are linked is not in doubt. But it comes as something of a
surprise that who is perceived as beautiful depends not only on the health of
the person in question but also on the average level of health in the place
where she lives. This, though, is the conclusion of a study just published in Biology Letters by Urszula
Marcinkowska of the University of Turku, in Finland, and her colleagues—for Ms
Marcinkowska has found that men in healthy countries think women with the most
feminine faces are the prettiest whilst those in unhealthy places prefer more
masculine-looking ones.
If you examine the chart you will find that the United
States falls in the middle of the nations on the basis of health.
Apparently, in a country where people are more sickly, men
prefer women with more masculine features. The researchers suspect that in such
conditions, men are not confident that they will live long enough or be strong
enough to support their families on their own:
Previous
studies have shown that women with feminine features are more fertile. A man’s
preference for them is thus likely to enhance his reproductive success. Ms
Marcinkowska speculates that testosterone-induced behavioural characteristics
like dominance, which might be expected to correlate with masculine-looking
faces even in women (they certainly do in men), help in the competition for
resources needed to sustain children once they are born. But why that should be
particularly important in an unhealthy country is unclear.
And yes, we know that a statistical correlation does not
spell causation, but still….
3 comments:
"But why (masculine-looking faces and competition for resources) should be particularly important in an unhealthy country is unclear."
Unhealthy = poor. From a distance, a man lays eyes on a potential mate. Try saying this approvingly, in your best eastern European accent:
"Hah! Strong woman! Pull plow!"
If the overall health is lower, a sturdy woman (more masculine looking) is the better option for progeny.
Reminds me of a '40s movie I saw; man is looking for a woman, his mom told him to look for a wide-hipped woman--gives birth easier.
"In a nation that suffers generally bad health men are more likely to find more masculine looking women more attractive."
Not more attractive. More useful... like a horse.
Post a Comment