You probably remember the famous words of that great
prophet, Paul Krugman. (Let's hope that Krugman is a prophet. He is certainly not talking about reality.) Defending the British National Health Service in 2009,
Krugman confidently denounced all of the “scare stories” about NHS treatments as false.
To recall his words:
In
Britain, the government itself runs the hospitals and employs the doctors.
We’ve all heard scare stories about how that works in practice; these stories
are false. Like every system, the National Health Service has problems, but
over all it appears to provide quite good care while spending only about 40
percent as much per person as we do.
A scientific attitude requires that we test such statements against reality. Today, the Daily Mail reports on how the NHS treats
the elderly:
Tens of
thousands of elderly patients are enduring appalling NHS care because they are
too frightened – or too polite – to complain.
They
suffer in silence fearing even worse treatment if they dare to raise criticism,
England’s health watchdog Dame Julie Mellor warned.
She
said she had investigated cases of pensioners being effectively starved on
wards and treated without a shred of dignity.
The story continues:
Despite
being the last port of call for complaints, Dame Julie receives around 16,000
every year.
Of 904
NHS cases she investigated between April and December last year, 222 concerned
the elderly.
She
said: ‘There are common themes running through complaints about the care of
older people.
Misdiagnosis,
staff attitudes, poor communication with patients and families, substandard
nutrition, and patients not being treated with dignity, just to name a few.’
One
older man with Alzheimer’s and diabetes was prevented from going home to die
beside the brother he had lived with his whole life. This, she said, was the
result of a ‘string of errors by five organisations across health and social
care’.
‘They
left it a month before they had a meeting about his care, by which time he’d
passed away without his dying wish being honoured.’
In
another case, a hospital did not consult the family on a decision not to
resuscitate and in a third, staff switched off a patient’s life support against
a family’s express wishes.
The scare stories are not false. Krugman’s arrogance and
ideological zealotry blind him to truth.
2 comments:
Paullie "The Beard" Krugman broadcasts his ignorance, and changes sides depending on who is president. If it were BUSH(!!!!1111!!!!)Care, he's be against it. But, he's a statist, and the state is always right when it's run from/by the Left.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303910404579489692798833528?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303910404579489692798833528.html
Asymmetric stupidity far better describes Krugman and much of the Left. Some people go to a university to get an education and actually learn whereas others go to get an indoctrination and have their prejudices enforced and then work for the NYTimes.
Post a Comment