American institutions of higher learning increasingly
function within an ideological bubble. When it comes to the humanities and
social sciences they have given up the pretense of teaching students and
have embraced a more radical agenda. They want to produce waves of social
justice warriors. The junior Red Guards who walked out of school a few days ago are now readying themselves to join the march.
Of course, professors and college presidents are so enthralled with their own great ideas
that they pay no attention to how it all looks to the public at large.
Increasingly, the public is looking askance at institutions that have lost
their mission and have become tools of radical leftist ideologues.
Reputation matters. It matters even for institutions of
higher education. As more colleges and universities close and as other schools
eliminate majors that students no longer consider to be worth the time and
expense, a sea change is under way. Perhaps slowly, but surely.
The Washington Times reports the story and adds some remarks
about the way college presidents see their current condition:
Soaring
tuition costs, degrees of dubious value and nonstop student activism have combined
to bring public confidence in the ivory tower tumbling down.
Even
college and university presidents acknowledge that the country is becoming
disillusioned with higher education. In a recent survey conducted by Inside Higher Ed and Gallup, 51 percent
of institution leaders said the 2016 election “exposed that academe is
disconnected from much of American society.”
The
erosion of higher education’s brand comes as no surprise to Cornell Law
School professor William A.
Jacobson. He said the public’s negative perception of academia reflects the
“reality of left-wing bias disconnected from American society.”
“Particularly
in the humanities and social sciences, many faculty view political activism and
indoctrination as a core part of their academic mission,” said Mr. Jacobson,
who runs the Legal Insurrection blog. “While they may have the academic freedom to do so,
there is a price to pay for the higher educational system.”
When
asked to assess which factors are responsible for the negative view of higher
education, 86 percent of college and university presidents cited the perception
of liberal bias on campus.
Let us be clear. The problem is not liberal bias. The problem
is radical leftist bias. Liberal used to mean open minded, willing to discuss
ideas freely. The current wave of campus repression is aimed at shutting down
debate and discussion. And in punishing anyone who would dare offering a discordant opinion.
As for the question of preparing students for careers, the
college presidents have a point:
Ninety-eight
percent of college presidents said concerns about affordability and student
debt are factors contributing to higher education’s image problem, and 95
percent pointed to concerns about whether college education adequately prepares
students for careers.
As for their point, it ought to be clear that the more these
institutions teach the art of protest and the virtue of fighting for social
justice, the less their students will be prepared to work in the real world. If
a student walks into a job interview with a resume filled with courses in
social justice and culture warfare, in ethnic studies and the Marxist fairy tales
of the Frankfurt school, any hiring officer will understand immediately that
this young person has been so thoroughly deformed, mentally, that he or she
will not be capable of showing the requisite loyalty to the company or even
to do a creditable job. It's not just ideas that have been drummed out of them. They have also overcome their work ethic. And they certainly do not believe in any jobs that would create wealth. If the job involves redistributing wealth that someone else has earned, they might be on board. After all, it assuages the guilt they feel over their white privilege.
6 comments:
"Reputation matters. It matters even for institutions of higher education."
Even? I would say it matters *especially* for such institutions. The brand is a big part of what they are selling, whether it's Eaton in 19th-century Britain or Harvard in the USA today.
With physical products, a famous brand will only get you so far: if everyone's Mercedes turns out to have transmission problems, the "brand equity" of that brand will slide into reverse real fast. Whereas if graduates of a particular highly-thought-of university turn out to be lacking in knowledge and common sense, it will take longer for the market to realize the fallen value...but it will happen eventually. Especially if the fall is common to almost the entire universe of higher ed institutions.
I was trying to be ironic... apparently, not very successfully.
Prepare them for a career? Have you talked to one, ANY one lately? None of the university graduates in 15 YEARS are prepared for LIFE. None can go three sentences without being offended or starting an argument. They have no real skills outside their smartphones. Most have the social skills of potted plants. And can't engage personally with anything. Puppies and kittens included!
The ivory tower has a great deal to answer for.
Fall? I'd say "Dove in, headfirst."
"When asked to assess which factors are responsible for the negative view of higher education, 86 percent of college and university presidents cited the perception of liberal bias on campus." It's not a "perception"; it's blatantly obvious.
"If a student walks into a job interview with a resume filled with courses in social justice and culture warfare, in ethnic studies and the Marxist fairy tales of the Frankfurt school, any hiring officer will understand immediately that this young person has been so thoroughly deformed, mentally, that he or she will not be capable of showing the requisite loyalty to the company or even to do a creditable job."
Um, the unpleasant reality is that these days the hiring manager and her (sarc on) boss also have a resume filled with courses in social justice, culture warfare, "critical queer studies", etc. and would find the applicant a perfect fit.
Large corporations, and not just the new arrivals like Alphabet, Facebook, et al., but some of the oldest and previously regarded as stodgy conservative institutions, have been conquered by the Left in a rout. If you are guilty of thoughtcrime these days you will have a hard time getting a job.
Yikes... it's worse than I thought. Have there been any studies on this, beyond the James Damores?
Post a Comment