Today, the United States is opening its new Embassy
in Jerusalem. It is a momentous event for the people of Israel, and it shows that
President Trump has discarded the consensus view of the foreign policy elites. Coupled
with his discarding the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord, this
gesture shows clearly that we have a new policy toward the Middle East.
Strangely enough, Caroline Glick points out, Trump is the
first American president to be unabashedly pro-Israeli. He is the first to
reject the notion that America must be even-handed, must play the honest broker
between Israel and the Palestinians.
Glick analyzes:
From
moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem, to walking away from the nuclear deal which
guaranteed Iran’s eventual acquisition of nuclear weapons and financed its
regional aggression and terrorism sponsorship, to unconditionally supporting
Israel’s military operations against Iranian positions in Syria, Trump has
demonstrated that he is the most pro-Israel president in US history. No other
president comes close.
The
difference between Trump and his predecessors is that Trump accepts Israel on
its own terms. He doesn’t expect Israel to do anything to “earn” American
support. So long as Israel is in America’s corner, he respects the Jewish state
as America’s ally.
And Trump has also modified the American political calculus.
Admittedly, American Jews are not the largest voting bloc. And yet, with the
Obama administration’s contempt for Israel, its insistence that Israel is the
problem, not the solution in the Middle East, the Republican Party has been
able to pick up the mantle as the pro-Israeli party.
Add to that the fact that
the Democratic Party has been led by Jeremiah Wright’s protégé, that its
current vice chairman is Louis Farrakhan’s protégé, that the members of the
Congressional Black Caucus, beyond boycotting Netanyahu’s speech in Congress, have refused to repudiate Farrakhan, and you should be seeing a shift in the
loyalty of American Jews.
Of course, we do not want to get ahead of ourselves. Many
Jewish Democrats, led by Sen. Chuck Schumer, were willing to denounce the Iran
nuclear deal when it was signed, but are complaining about Trump’s
withdrawal from same. We will see how long the cognitive dissonance can last.
For her part, as an Israeli, Glick also showers Prime
Minister Netanyahu with much of the credit for Israel’s current diplomatic
ascendance.
She opens by praising him:
For
many Republicans, Netanyahu is the most important foreign leader of our times.
In the ranks of their esteem he ranks a close second to Winston Churchill.
Netanyahu’s high standing is all the more remarkable given that Israel has no
British Empire behind it. In the vast scope of things, Israel is a tiny country
with no coattails.
Republicans
aren’t the only ones who admire him. World leaders from Russian President
Vladimir Putin to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Chinese Premier Xi
Jinping welcome him to their capitals like a visiting monarch. Sandwiched
between two major Israeli air assaults on Iranian military assets in Syria Tuesday
and Wednesday night, Netanyahu flew to Moscow. He stood next to Putin in Red
Square as the Red Army Band played “Hativka” during the parade marking the 73rd
anniversary of the Allied victory over Nazi Germany.
Netanyahu is not a citizen of the world. He represents
Israeli national interests, just as Trump defends America’s national interests:
Netanyahu
identifies Israel’s national interests. Then he scans the international
community for actors with aligned interests. He uses his considerable power of
persuasion to convince those actors to achieve common goals.
Both Trump and Netanyahu are pursuing policies that fly in
the face of the European consensus, represented recently by the weak-kneed
whiner, Federica Mogherini, European lead diplomat. Of late, Mogherini has declared
herself ready to rescue the Iran nuclear deal.
Glick summarizes the European view:
The EU
views the Arab world as a monolithic presence moved only by Israel’s
willingness to give Jerusalem to the PLO. So long as Israel refuses to give up
Jerusalem, the Arabs will reject the Jewish state. Once Israel has conceded its
eternal capital – and Judea and Samaria along with Gaza – the Arabs will be
placated in one fell swoop and immediately embrace Israel as a neighbor and
friend.
Netanyahu had the good sense to advance Israel’s interests
during the Obama years. And he helped Americans, especially Republicans, see
where America’s true interests lay:
During
the Obama years, Netanyahu realized that Obama’s policies toward Iran and the
Muslim Brotherhood imperiled Sunni Arab states no less, and perhaps even more,
than they imperiled Israel.
And he developed important and ground-breaking alliances
with his Arab neighbors:
Netanyahu
developed relations with Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE on the basis of these
shared concerns and shared interests in diminishing the deleterious
consequences of Obama’s policies. Although Netanyahu’s moves are unlikely to
generate extravagant signing ceremonies with doves and balloons, they did bring
about a situation where the Saudis, Egyptians and the UAE sided with Israel
against Hamas, Qatar and Turkey during Operation Protective Edge in 2014.
The result:
That
united front [with his Arab neighbors] prevented Obama from coercing Israel
into accepting Hamas’s cease-fire terms in the war.
So too,
the relationships Netanyahu built formed the basis of a united Israeli-Arab
front opposing Obama’s deal with Iran.
in
2017, Trump reframed the US’s alliance structure to one based on the common
Israeli-Sunni front against Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.
Netanyahu recognized that the Obama administration was
hostile to Israel, so he raised his voice to provide a counterpoint:
Netanyahu
did understand America though. He understood the Obama administration was
incurably hostile to Israel and that Obama viewed Israel as the main obstacle
to achieving his goals in the Middle East. Netanyahu understood that under
those circumstances, he had to find partners inside the US – in Congress and
among the general public – to lessen the damage Obama was causing Israel.
It culminated in a March, 2015 address to Congress:
Netanyahu’s
approach to the US during the Obama years, and indeed, during the Clinton
administration as well, was to recognize that the administration, while a key
actor, is just one actor in a much wider American society, which is by and
large deeply supportive of Israel. This insight informed Netanyahu’s decision
to bring his opposition to Obama’s nuclear diplomacy with Tehran to the American
people directly, through his address before a joint session of Congress in
March 2015.
Netanyahu
was reviled and attacked brutally by the Israeli and American Left for his
move. Both groups insisted that he was undermining and even destroying US ties
with Israel.
As for US/Israeli ties they have never been stronger than
they are today:
Netanyahu
recognized that the White House’s propaganda campaign on behalf of Obama’s
nuclear deal was even more dangerous to Israel than the deal itself. Obama’s
campaign centered on delegitimizing all of the deal’s critics, by castigating
them as Israeli agents and warmongers. If Obama’s efforts had succeeded, US
support for Israel would have crashed, as that support would have been
effectively rendered toxic and somehow treasonous.
Netanyahu stood before Congress and offered his support to
those who opposed the Iran nuclear deal:
By
coming to Washington and preserving the legitimacy of Obama’s opponents,
Netanyahu blocked Obama from securing the support of either a majority of US
lawmakers or a majority of the US public for his nuclear accord. His speech was
the foundation of the Republican Party’s rejection of Obama’s deal. It created
the political space for Democratic lawmakers to oppose their president’s most
important foreign policy initiative.
As America recognizes Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, Glick
wants us to note the important and skillful diplomacy practiced by Prime Minister Netanhahu:
Israel
is now reaping the rewards of Netanyahu’s visionary statesmanship. For his
efforts, over the course of 30 years, Netanyahu has roundly earned the ever
growing acknowledgment at home and abroad that he is the greatest statesman in
Israel’s history.
3 comments:
Trump can't be an honest broker between the Israelis and Palis, because the Palis are dishonest.
Well said. Remarkable man. Historic.
Post a Comment