Given that it is fast losing its audience, the National
Football League has decided no longer to allow players to disrespect the
National Anthem or the American flag on the sidelines before their games.
True enough and fair enough, players have a right to protest. They even have a right to insult the nation. They do not, of course, have a right to do as they please when in uniform and on the job. Also true, the same players
have asserted that they do not intend to insult the nation with their actions.
They are only trying to bring attention to a grievous social problem: white police
brutality.
We should be clear about one point. You do not own the
meaning of your gestures. Any more than you own the meaning of your words. If
you discover that many people consider your gesture to be
insulting, you should stop doing it. If you persist, you are insulting people,
attacking their patriotism and demeaning the nation.
Otherwise, you are claiming the right to play by your own rules, rules that do not pertain to
other people. For professional football players the claim to such a right is
absurd, on its face.
Naturally, one does
not have the right to say it, but the protest against white police officers,
especially against those who commit acts of violence against blacks, ignores
the simple fact that the problem of violent crime in black communities is not
the fault of white police officers. It is the problem of those who commit the
crimes. Shifting the blame to white police officers exonerates and even cheers
the perpetrators for drawing attention to what they consider to be a larger
social issue. The result is: more protests against white police and more crime
by blacks against blacks. Never in the course of these debates does anyone
summon up the courage to note the gross disparity between black-on-black crime
and white police on black crime.
As it happens, the increased national awareness of police shootings
has produced… more violence against white police officers. Ought the protesting
players to claim responsibility for this grievous outcome? Of course, no one
will dare hold them to account.
Secondly, as Jason Riley explains in the Wall Street Journal today, the players have been promoting a false narrative. There is no epidemic of white police
officers committing crimes against black citizens. And yet, the media hawks the
narrative as a higher truth, producing more crime against the police. One might also call it media incitement:
But the
protests have been more than an annoying distraction for sports fans. On a more
substantive level, they have been used by political progressives and the
mainstream media to advance a dangerous antipolice narrative at odds with the
available empirical data. An increase in the coverage of police shootings,
thanks to social media and cable news, has been presented as evidence of an
increase in the number of police shootings. Statistically rare and isolated
incidents are offered as evidence of an epidemic.
In
fact, police use of lethal force has been falling for decades. Police shootings
in New York City are down by more than 90% since the early 1970s. In Chicago,
shootings involving police fell by more than half—to 44 from 107—between 2011
and 2015, according to a database compiled by the Chicago Tribune. That means
police-involved shootings represented just over 1% of total shootings in the
Windy City in 2015. Over the same five-year period, police in other major
cities with sizable minority populations, including Los Angeles, Houston and
Philadelphia, resorted to lethal force less frequently than Chicago police
officers.
A
recent study published in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Surgery assessed more
than a million service calls to police departments in North Carolina, Louisiana
and Arizona and found that cops used physical force in the course of arrests
less than 1% of the time.
So, Roger Goodell has finally done the right thing.
Hopefully, he has done it in time to prevent the National Football League by
incinerating itself on the bonfire of political correctness.
10 comments:
This issue is fascinating in how it brings out fashionable, faux activist “principles.” Long love Che chic!
Would ESPN be within its rights if it sanctioned its “journalists” for disrespecting their audience with protest-oriented political speech, to the detriment of the network’s reputation and profitable operation? They certainly would. Oh, that’s right... ESPN journalists are doing that already! Silly me.
It is impossible to be too cynical about one Roger Goodell. And lo, he sided with the fans, which is the source of NFL income. How insane.
Jason Riley’s only problem is that he thinks facts matter to these Progressive nuts, who can’t get their arms around the idea that all lives matter.
And to think a writer at a magazine called REASON compared Roseanne’s firing to the NFL situation. Quite unreasonable.
The whole media class is so silly.
And now uber-intellect Kim Kardashian is going to a White House for a “summit” on prison reform. No wonder Kanye’s views on things have... changed.
The Glowing Box makes people stupid.
Delete again, please. There is a epidemic of AO on this blog. Weasel, unreal, unimportant. Look in the mirror.
We should be clear about one point. You do not own the meaning of your gestures. Any more than you own the meaning of your words. If you discover that many people consider your gesture to be insulting, you should stop doing it. If you persist, you are insulting people....
A good point.
I wonder to what degree the kneeling protests did harm to their own racial cause by reminding NFL viewers just how often young black men get involved in scuffles with the police?
I see SOMEBODY has gone over the line 6 times. FLAG on the play.
Penalty (suggested): Sit out the next six posts.
Post a Comment