Friday, December 13, 2019

The New Improved Hillary


Has the dowager duchess of Chappaqua had some work done? Has she had a lot of work done? Do you think that the work done has improved her appearance... or has it made her unrecognizable. It's called: losing face.

Hillary Clinton, 72, looks incredibly youthful at an event on Broadway

4 comments:

Derek Ramsey said...

Looks to me like a difference in the focal length of the camera used for the photo. The left was taken with a wide angle lens (probably a cell phone camera) and the one on the right taken with a 'real' camera.

Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCD said...

Okay Derek Ramsey, so it’s a lens issue. Let’s accept that.

Doesn’t explain a lot of things. Like the hair, which is also unkempt and hideous. Is that a “style” outside the geriatric or lesbian sub-culture?

She's looking directly into the camera. Who allowed that photo to be taken??? That is a posed — a.k.a., an “allowed” — shot.

I pray she gets back into the race. Democrats have been playing on obstruction, Russia, Ukraine, un-likability, etc.

Bring it on. If she’s the best the Dems have, then I say... FUN!

And in case you think I’m engaging in hair- or face-shaming, ask a group of women to analyze this latest picture. You’ll find I’m being quite kind...

Matt Harris said...

The left is veering into Uncanny Valley territory.

Steve said...

Focal Length.....different cameras.....I don't know about any of that.....just seeing that face again makes me wanna barf......

Steve