When it comes to marijuana, we don’t know. We don’t seem to
have any reliable scientific research about the effects of weed. As the nation
dives headfirst into legalization of marijuana, we should know more. We don’t. All we know is that Justin Trudeau's Canada is leading the march toward legalization... and that should cause us to have some serious doubts.
Writing in The New Yorker Malcolm Gladwell aims to be
judicious in his appraisal of the research. In many ways it raises as many
questions as it asks. (Via Maggie’s Farm).
Gladwell sums up the results of recent research:
A few
years ago, the National Academy of Medicine convened a panel of sixteen leading
medical experts to analyze the scientific literature on cannabis. The report they prepared, which came out in January of
2017, runs to four hundred and sixty-eight pages. It contains no bombshells or
surprises, which perhaps explains why it went largely unnoticed. It simply
stated, over and over again, that a drug North Americans have become
enthusiastic about remains a mystery.
And yet… a recent peer-reviewed study, published in the
Journal of Neuroscience, suggests that adolescents, people whose brains have
not developed fully, incur a risk when they smoke weed. Even in seemingly
small quantities weed can change the structure of the adolescent brain. Of course, as Gladwell notes, these studies do not often factor in the different kinds of weed and the different concentrations of certain chemical compounds. It's devilishly difficult to do a scientific study when the substances being tested are anything but identical.
The Daily Mail has the story:
Just
one or two joints is enough to change the structure of a teenager's brain,
scientists have warned.
And the
drug could cause changes affecting how likely they are to suffer from anxiety
or panic, according to a study.
Researchers
found 14-year-old girls and boys exposed to THC – the psychoactive chemical in
cannabis – had a greater volume of grey matter in their
brains.
This
means the tissue in certain areas is thicker, and it was found to be in the
same areas as the receptors which marijuana affects.
Experts
said thickening of brain tissue is the opposite of what usually happens during
puberty, when teenagers' brain matter gets thinner and more refined.
And also:
Researchers
from the University of Vermont scanned the brains of teenagers from England,
Ireland, France and Germany to study marijuana's effects.
They
found differences in the volume of grey matter in the amygdala and the
hippocampus.
These
sections are involved with emotions, fear, memory development and spatial
skills – changes to them suggests smoking cannabis could affect these
faculties.
Scientists
said theirs is the first evidence to suggest structural brain changes and
cognitive effects of just one or two uses of cannabis in young teenagers.
And it
suggests as teenagers brains are still developing, they may be particularly
vulnerable to the effects of THC.
In today’s cultural climate we all seem to recognize that something
is wrong with the adolescent brain. We tend, as a rule, to blame it on social
media and hand-held gadgets. And yet, if a third of 10th graders have
tried weed, we should also pay some attention to its influence on the developing
brain. And we ought perhaps to be more judicious before pronouncing it perfectly safe. And before
encouraging its use:
Dr Orr
concluded: 'Almost 35 per cent of American 10th graders have reported using
cannabis and existing research suggests that initiation of cannabis use in
adolescence is associated with long-term neurocognitive effects.
'We
understand very little about the earliest effects of cannabis use, however, as
most research is conducted in adults with a heavy pattern of lifetime use.
'This
study presents evidence suggesting structural brain and cognitive effects of
just one or two instances of cannabis use in adolescence.'
2 comments:
The Manichean-style arguments about marijuana safety, and indeed the safety of any substance in the environment from cigarette smoke to vitamin C, suffer from one vital omission: specification of the dose - response curve. Consider thallium. Thallium is an extremely toxic metal. It has been used in assassinations. Even so, radioactive (!) thallium-201 is deliberately injected into patients by medical professionals to run cardiological stress tests. As toxicologists are wont to say, the poison is in the dose.
I have no doubt that chronic marijuana smoking is dangerous, for the tars present in the smoke if for no other reason. This would be particularly true for juvenile organisms of any species. Compounding (no pun intended) the problem is the existence of very powerful, genetically engineered, variations of marijuana. Since a toxic dosage level is unknown, the dosage present in any given sample purchased retail is unspecified, and the dosage is somewhat dependent on the delivery method, it's best to simply avoid it.
Gladwell's opener says well "Permitting pot is one thing; promoting its use is another."
What is most confusing to me is why anyone would willing take an illegal drug from an unknown origin, almost I guess this is more likely and dangerous with heroin. But was legal, at least someone could be held to account if it has been laced.
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/marijuana-rehab/what-can-marijuana-be-laced-with
Legalizing for adults shouldn't clearly make it easier to get by teens but if it is cheaper, probably it will increase usage. There has to be some optimal balance between reefer madness fear mongering that is laughed at and just the facts that mostly says "we don't know" in so many important questions.
Are mental ill people more drawn to drugs, or do drug actually cause some mental illness? I'd argue that mental illness is party about becoming detached from reality, not like the paranoia you experience from lack of sleep, and drugs that distort our perceptions make it easier to slide into that detachment, and it makes more likely your life will be a mess, and once you have an instant escape painful awareness, why ever stop?
Post a Comment