As always happens in letters written to advice columnists,
they are short on facts and long on sentiment. I will underscore, yet again, if
you do not know the facts on the ground you are in no position to offer advice.
Today, the New York Times etiquette columnist, Philip Galanes, faces this problem. A trio of couples has been hanging out together
for years. Recently, two of the women took the third aside and told her that
they no longer wished to hang out with her husband. They had decided to vote him off the island.
You might be wondering why?
The woman does not say why? So, Galanes is at something of a loss. He handles
it adeptly, but still, we would like to have a better idea. And we would like to know whether the qualities that the women find repugnant are qualities that his wife finds endearing.
The Times headline suggests that the woman's friends do not like her husband. It's one thing not to like someone. It's quite another to say that you cannot abide his presence. At the very least, the judgment does not seem to have been taken lightly or impulsively. The two women must have been trying to deal with the situation for years.
Here is the letter:
For six years, my husband and I have been great
friends with two other couples. We ate together, traveled together and hung out
a lot. Recently, the other couples told me (separately, but within a month of
each other) that they are no longer willing to spend time with my husband. No
reason was given. Both couples said they are open to seeing me without him.
This is going to break my husband’s heart! Should I tell him directly, or let
him discover that he’s being ghosted over time? Is there any way to continue my
relationship with these friends?
It’s going to break his heart.
Does that tell us anything? I do not know. But, who speaks about her husband in terms that would be more appropriate to a female? Galanes is at something of a loss,
so he sketches out an analysis:
I’m
sort of astonished that you didn’t ask your friends (either time!) why your
husband was being cast out into the desert. Does this mean you have a hunch? Or
maybe it’s not the first time they’ve mentioned their difficulties with him.
Either way, I would ask for a clear explanation of the problem.
I suspect that she knows why, but does not think that the
offense is worth shunning. Perhaps, as noted above, the man has bad table
manners. Perhaps he whines too much. One suspects that this is not the first
time she has heard of the problem, and that preceding efforts to change things
have not worked. I suspect that she had been put on notice, had mentioned it to her husband, and that he did not change. She might have thought nothing of his bad manners, but other people found them to be seriously disconcerting.
In other words, if she does not mention the nature of the problem, she might not think that it's much of a problem. And if she does not mention it, the chances are that it has been addressed many times before.
Galanes sensibly looks toward self-correction:
We all
have failings. But if we’re put on notice of them constructively, we can often
make big improvements. If your husband is a conversation hog, occasionally
snarky, or too strident in his politics, he can work on those issues if he is
told about them. I also get that it can be hard to lodge complaints with
friends, especially if they’re defensive. But six years of camaraderie should
buy your husband some good will.
Of
course, there are other problems that are much harder, if not impossible, to
bounce back from: if your husband has been cruel, for example, or behaved in
seriously inappropriate ways. So, find out what the beef is, discuss it with
your husband directly, and decide together if there’s a feasible plan for
rehabilitation.
Of course, if she negotiates a reprieve and tells her
husband that he must stop slurping his soup or chewing with his mouth open… he
is likely to become more self-conscious and resentful.
Galanes continues:
As for
maintaining your own relationship with these couples, unless your husband’s
offense is grave, could you really continue being friends with people who won’t
let him apologize and try to do better in the future? And if his behavior was
truly egregious, you have bigger fish to fry, no?
It might be the case that she has known the women for a long
time, which would be one kind of problem. I suspect that he has already
apologized and has failed to correct his ways. I agree that the woman’s
relationship with her friends has probably been compromised. It feels as though
the issue has been ongoing for years and that her husband has not changed.
Perhaps it‘s a personality issue. Perhaps he’s an opinionated lout. Perhaps he does not know how to dress properly. We do not
know.
As for the possibility that the behavior was egregious, as in, he made a
pass at one of the women or even one of the men, Galanes is correct to note that the letter writer has a bigger
problem.
1 comment:
It's a riddle, inside a mystery, enclosed in an enigma. Which means, I don't know because there's nothing to go on, being clueless.
Post a Comment