The Michelle Alexander New York Times op-ed about Israel was openly
anti-Semitic. I commented about it on the blog. One is shocked to see that the Times would hire an op-ed columnist who can be so biased and so
ignorant and so hostile toward Israel.
Since I had my say, I am happy to pass along some more
recent comments by Alan Dershowitz.
The
front page of The New York Times Sunday Review featured one of the most biased,
one-sided, historically inaccurate, ignorant, and bigoted articles ever
published by that venerable newspaper. Written by Michele Alexander it is
entitled: “Time to break the silence on Palestine,” as if the Palestinian issue
has not been the most over-hyped cause on campuses, the United Nations, and the
media. There is no silence to break. What must be broken is the bigotry of
those who elevate the Palestinian claims over those of the Kurds, the Syrians,
the Iranians, the Chechnyans, the Tibetans, the Ukrainians, and many other more
deserving groups who truly suffer from the silence of the academy, the media
and the international community. The United Nations devotes more resources —
time, money and votes — to the Palestinian issue than to the claims of all the
other oppressed groups combined. Some of these other groups cannot even get a
hearing at the United Nations.
As for the suffering of the Palestinian people, it has resulted from policies dictated by their leaders, beginning with Yasser Arafat. Did
you know that Arafat’s uncle, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem wholeheartedly supported Adolph Hitler… because he believed that Hitler would rid the world of
Jews:
The
suffering of the Palestinians, which does not compare to the suffering of other
groups, has been largely self-inflicted. They could have had a state, with no
occupation, if they had accepted the Peale Commission Report of 1938, the
United Nations Partition of 1947, the Clinton Barak offer of 2000-2001, the
Ehud Olmert offer of 2008. They rejected all these offers — responding with
violence and terrorism — because they would have required them to accept Israel
as the nation-state of the Jewish people — something they are unwilling to do even
today. I know, because I have asked President Abbas that question directly and
he has said no. The Palestinian leadership has always wanted there not to be a
Jewish state more than
they wanted there to be a Palestinian state.
Dershowitz calls out Alexander for creating an alternative universe where pro-Palestinian voices are drowned out by Jews. It is a flat-out lie:
Dershowitz calls out Alexander for creating an alternative universe where pro-Palestinian voices are drowned out by Jews. It is a flat-out lie:
Israel
is not without some fault, but the one-sided-blame-it-all-on-Israel approach
taken by Alexander is ahistorical and bigoted. One illustration of the author’s
bias is her absurd claim that “many students are fearful of expressing support
for Palestinian rights” because of “McCarthyite tactics” employed by pro-Israel
groups. Has Alexander ever actually been on a campus? Well, I have taught and
lectured at hundreds of campuses, and I can attest that there is no
international cause that is given more attention — far more than it deserves in
comparison with other more compelling causes — than the Palestinians. It is
pro-Israel students who are silenced out of fear of being graded down, denied
recommendations, and been shunned by peers. Efforts have been made to prevent
me from speaking on several campuses, despite the fact that I advocate a
two-state solution to the conflict.
1 comment:
"The Michelle Alexander New York Times op-ed about Israel was openly anti-Semitic. I commented about it on the blog. One is shocked to see that the Times would hire an op-ed columnist who can be so biased and so ignorant and so hostile toward Israel." It IS what I would expect of the NYT.
I don't recall who said, "The Palestinians never miss a chance to miss a chance", but he spoke TRUTH.
Post a Comment