As best I can tell I count among the very few human beings
who has never owned or operated an Apple device. That includes iPhones, iPads,
iMacs and all of their predecessors. Heck, I haven’t even owned their stock.
Perhaps this means something. More likely, it doesn’t. Though,
it certainly would have been a good thing to own the stock… until this week,
that is.
From a yearly high of 233, Apple reached a new low of 142 on Thursday. Yesterday
it rallied back to 148. That is well within the bounds of a bear market.
Anyway, there is clearly an Apple mystique. The company
attracts adherents and true believers. People love its products and are willing
to pay up for them. Given my limited experience I cannot tell you whether Apple
products are worth the extra cost, but a lot of people think so. And a lot of
people helped drive the company market cap to somewhere around $1,000,000,000.
Today, it’s around$700,000,000. Still not chump change.
Even Warren Buffet invested heavily in Apple. And
Buffett is not a reckless investor. He owns more than 250 million shares of
Apple. If he is right about the company he is now loading up on more shares. If
he is wrong, he and his investors are about to take a serious bath.
Anyway, the bloom seems to be off of Apple. When the stock
fell this week, some analysts, including the ruling elites of Apple, blamed it
on Donald Trump’s trade war with China. Sales of iPhones in China have fallen,
and why not blame it on Trump.
It turns out, however, that the story is more complicated
than that. The Wall Street Journal reports that Apple is losing market share in
the gargantuan Chinese market. It is losing out to local companies who are
offering equivalent features at lower prices. Chinese consumers seem not to
be overly impressed by Apple. They no longer consider its products to be worth the premium.
As the old saying goes: It’s the market, stupid. The Journal
has the bad news:
While
Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive, blamed China’s economic slowdown for
weakening sales that hurt its global revenue in the past quarter, the
company’s problems run deeper than that. The Cupertino, Calif., tech giant may
have underestimated how competitive domestic smartphone makers have become,
analysts say.
Once a
top-seller in China, Apple has slipped to the fifth-biggest phone seller in
that country, trailing four domestic producers that have all been growing in
popularity. Despite developing more features targeted at Chinese consumers,
Apple’s market share has stagnated.
And also:
Chinese
consumers who won’t pay for the status of brandishing the top-priced
iPhone model are considered more fickle when it comes to brands, said Mo Jia, a
Shanghai-based analyst at market-research firm Canalys. As the economic
slowdown pushes consumers to tighten their purse strings, such consumers are
generally more inclined to consider cheaper, non-Apple smartphones, Mr. Jia
said.
Apple is not just losing out in China. It is losing out in
other markets, around the world. The New York Times report complements the Wall
Street Journal report, nicely:
To most
Americans, the names are unfamiliar, maybe a little hard to pronounce: Huawei,
Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo.
They
are China’s biggest smartphone brands. Around the world — although not in the
United States — they are making the handset business brutally competitive. This
week, after Apple warned of disappointing iPhone sales in China, industry observers said that
devices from the Chinese brands were a major culprit.
As the
phone market in China reaches saturation and sales shrink over all, the
country’s hardware makers are pushing hard, and increasingly winning fans, in
places like France, Germany, India and Southeast Asia, where consumers find that
the phones can do just about everything an iPhone can do at a fraction of the
cost.
Apple
sits comfortably atop the market in many countries, including China, for
the highest-end handsets. But companies like Huawei
have started to do elsewhere what they have done in China, competing with the
iPhone on experience and value and luring customers with price comparisons that
make them rethink buying Apple’s signature product.
The
cost difference is notable: In China, an iPhone XR starts at around $950, while
Huawei’s top-end handsets start at about $600, and Xiaomi’s comparable models
start at even less. The iPhone XS starts at around $1,250.
A French banker explains his experience:
Clément
Blaise, a 25-year-old banker in northern France, has an iPhone for work and a
Xiaomi as a personal phone. He said he needed to recharge the Apple device “all
the time” but could go two days without charging his Xiaomi.
“We
have this false, preconceived idea that Chinese brands are not as good, that
their products are of cheap quality,” Mr. Blaise said. “But the price gap
leavens the fears. For 150 euros” — around $170 — “what do you risk anyway?”
So, Apple used to win customers by claiming that their
products were better. And that Chinese products were cheap imitations. Now, it
appears, people around the world are beginning to see that such is not the
case. The bloom is off the Apple.
Chinese manufacturers have been having problems penetrating the American market. American government officials fear
the Chinese devices will be used to spy on Americans. The result, it has done
everything in its power to tamp down sales:
The
American government has worked for years to stymie the sale of Huawei’s
smartphones and telecom-network equipment, after a congressional inquiry in
2012 deemed Huawei a potential vehicle for cyberspying by the Chinese
government. The Trump administration has urged Western allies to do the same.
Security
concerns have not dissuaded some buyers across the Atlantic. Giannis
Vassilopoulos, a college student in Athens, said he had been bombarded by
Huawei ads during his recent travels around Europe. He said he had bought a
Huawei phone because the brand felt more familiar, more European even.
I cannot tell you whether the concerns are reasonable or
unreasonable. I suspect that they are based on sound analysis of the
technology. And yet, the American attitude is certainly good for Apple stock. The world markets are telling another story, and it is not good news
for the Cupertino colossus.
Some contrarian investors will see the flurry of downbeat
stories as a sign that they should buy Apple stock. Some will say that it’s
only the first of many waves. In any case, it’s worth paying attention to the
verdict offered by the markets.
5 comments:
I have also never owned an Apple product. We need a secret handshake or something.
I seem to be temperamentally opposed to seeking out the newest thing and cults and it is both. Nobody lines up for days to buy the new Android. If apple can't indoctrinate the Chinese into the cult they're not going to buy their products. Also, the Chinese phones can go two days without a charge? Now I want to get rid of my Android and get Huawei
I like Apple products.
The first McIntosh computer I used - but did not pay for because it was ridiculously expensive and had a limited software base incompatible with everything else in the known universe - I expensed because it had a graphical waveform editor that had been available only on even more ridiculously expensive graphics workstations like the now-extinct Silicon Graphics machines.
Then, I persuaded a rich client (a Baby Bell) to buy me a ridiculously expensive toy called the NeXT Machine, arguably Steve Jobs' most brilliant computing innovation. Loved that baby, but it was a total market flop because it was ridiculously expensive and utterly incompatible with everything else.
Expensed several ridiculously expensive Apples following the NeXT debacle, forced to be compatible with clients' internal Apple computing infrastructure.
Against my better judgment, I personally bought my wife a ridiculously expensive early iPhone device. She is now an Android customer, because virtually everything she needed for her device ultimately came from Apple, Apple support, or the Apple store.
My problem with Apple is not so much the price as the market philosophy. Apple products are ridiculously expensive, yes. But they are very high quality. I've never picked a bad Apple from the barrel. My problem is the Apple market philosophy that forces consumers into Appleworld. The architecture was always closed and only Apple products and services were compatible with the devices they sold. For example, the ubiquitous and dirt-cheap floppy disk was not compatible with the otherwise magnificent NeXT machine. Users were forced to use optical disks priced at well over $100 a pop (in the late 80's) and utterly incompatible with everything else. It won't surprise you to know I despise iTunes, the nu-males and gamer gamines employed in Apple stores, and the insufferable uber-virtue-signaler, Tim Cook.
Looks like the unapologetically nationalist-minded Chinese consumer base is waking up to Baziuo Computing, aka Apple.
I've never owned an apple product, although I had an Apple II+ clone back in the 1980s. I do recall hearing that Apple software developers were encouraged to develop their products for what's easy for users rather than what's easy for programmers. So they'd actually count how many clicks it took to do frequent tasks, and that made sense.
I think I'm also anti-branding, so even if I did own an apple laptop, I'm sure I'd put a sticker over that apple logo on the back. It would just feel embarrassing to become a advertisement for Apple, but if they gave me 50% off their jacked up prices, I'd consider promising to not cover their logo.
I won't discount those who say "buy low", except for the fact I think after a 10 year recovery we're due for an even larger correction or crash just waiting for an excuse. I don't think the market exists outside of false promises that the Fed will bail everyone out when people get scared.
I have never owned and Apple device, and I'm not going to, but I did, 30-some years ago, use an Apple Lisa. Didn't like it.
I own and use iPad, iPhone, iMac and MacBook.
Their new Apple replacements are becoming not worth the premium paid.
They used to be intuitive and fairly easy to use and operate.
Now they are looking more and more like "just another computer", but at a higher price.
My 6s+ phone does so much more than I need that I do not see replacing it for a few more years, if that.
As long as the battery is able to be swapped.
My iPad Mini replacement cost is $350 and is mostly used as a reader for Kindle books. Amazons Fire HD 10 is $150 and does what I want.
My iMac is used about once a month for backing up photos, replacement cost is $930. A HP all in one is $350.
My MacBook ($1100) is used lots and will probably be replaced by a (used) Mac Book Air. I have been shopping around and a 3 year old model is under $400.
Oh, all the prices for the Apple products are for refurbished models, not new ones.
Post a Comment