Thursday, October 25, 2018

Feminists Disrespecting Women

When will feminists learn to respect women?

Today, we have the high priestess of social media, one Sheryl Sandberg, hard at work-- not at Facebook, not at home-- but leading a social revolution.

Sandberg has just discovered what most of us have known for a very long time: that the #MeToo movement is hurting women. It is making life more difficult for them in the workplace.

Sandberg is shocked to learn that #MeToo has not advanced women’s career prospects. I am guessing that she is the last to know.

Thanks to #MeToo women have become a threat to men. Many men prefer not to hire attractive young women. If they do hire attractive young women, they prefer not to be alone in an office with them. They prefer not to have lunch or dinner meetings with them. Why risk life and family when you have so little to gain.

What is the Sandberg solution? The Wall Street Journal reports:

Ms. Sandberg’s suggestion: Treat all your colleagues equally. If managers are uncomfortable having dinners alone with women, they should stop having dinners alone with men as well. “Group lunches for everyone,” she said.

This is dumber than dumb. Sandberg believes that she can issue imperial edicts and control the everyday behavior of men in the workplace. If such were company policy, how could you enforce it? Would two company men be allowed to play golf together? And, how can you prevent men from feeling antagonistic toward women who believe that they have the right to police social behavior. It means that Sandberg should keep her day job.

Sandberg and other ideologically driven executives should not believe that their mastery of social media makes them expert players in the marketplace of ideas.

Sandberg believes that female underrepresentation is a problem. Funny thing, I had thought that corporations were supposed to be making profits, not engaging in dubious forms of social engineering:

Women remain underrepresented within companies at every level, Facebook Inc. FB +1.55% Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg and other senior leaders said—despite the #MeToo movement.

Where did anyone get the idea that corporations should have staff that demonstrates proportional representation? It is not the case at Facebook. It is not the case in Silicon Valley. Worse yet, it disrespects women. Sandberg assumes that because she wants to wield corporate power, that all women want the same thing. And she believes that bigotry is the only thing that stands in the way of women’s proportional representation. Thus, the purge of abusive men ought, by her lights, lead to more women being promoted in the corporate world.

Perhaps Sandberg-- a single mother, by the way-- has nothing better to do with her time than work, but many women prefer to spend more time with their children and less time on the job. It is their choice. Shouldn’t we respect their decisions? Don’t we know that most women take their responsibilities to their children very seriously? Should we not respect their decisions?

Reducing it all to sexual harassment, making it appear that men are the problem… this ideologically driven narrative disrespects women and makes them look like marionettes.

13 comments:

Sam L. said...

Feminists are shooting the feet of other women, as well as their own, with these tactics.

Dr. Irredeemable Dreg said...

"Group lunches for everyone."

Shark, jumped. :-D

Besides, how long will it take for NPC-speak to define "group lunch" as gang rape when some Bimbaprog doesn't like the menu?

Anonymous said...

She’s a widow, not a single mother.

Anonymous said...

The Implicitly-Binary System in the link to comments below can RAPIDLY fix this problem.

IBS is a Rapid & HIGHLY EFFECTIVE ONLY-2-Genders Sorting system that is Human Readable and employs multiple already WELL proven methods throughout history that WILL accurately sort ALL people who are NOT 100% pure TruePenis Males into the correct 100% accurate gender category in which the ONLY kind of "other than 100% male" gender that can survive under such a PERFECT system is the 100% TrueVagina Females, who are of an obediently passive yet Righteously Brutally Dominant over weak low conforming males that may be straying from the path of 100% TruePenis Righteousness. These 100% TruVags are never Feminist, in fact Feminism cannot exist under such an easily understandable Implicity-Binary way of life. The concept of feminism becomes incomprehensible to all except perhaps the most wisest of Philosphers who retain the Secrets of preserving 100% ACCURATE Implicitly-Binary Gender roles due to the fact that the consciousness of all 100% TrueVaginas, especially those who are weak undergo a unconscious TOTAL immersion using the power of the Totally-Perfect Implicitly-Binary System by gradually merging the perfectly silenced Implicitly-Binary True-Vags into the custodianship of the ALMIGHTY "." PERIOD "." PLACEHOLDER SYSTEM.

http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2018/10/transgenderism-and-homophobia.html

Dr. Irredeemable Dreg said...

I see that residents of the Bates Motel and Rest Home's Tittering Ward went on a blogosphere field trip yesterday. This one's a keeper, Schneiderman.

Anonymous said...

DiD love your post bro,

Am I the only one here who thinks that the Old Fashion Analog Speech Buzzer had far more class and style points than the Green Screen Backdrop Clappers?

Anonymous said...

GOTTA RESPECT THAT BUZZER!

Anonymous said...

DiD, part of what makes Implicit-Binary workable is the PEEN function. The nuts and bolts are:

1. The PEEN function, the core concept of the P- core shell. PEEN is a historical regression model (that can be loosely defined with difficulty in the blog setting but basically is;

For male only as an example, Using '?' to symbolize:
Year0 Malehood status indeterminable for both individual (mode of consciousness for the particular representative male in particular time and era) and the 'non-individual' (the historical trajectory and social trends for the time period in question)

= 'equal' to
> Regresses to
So for Male Historical Regression ?M => "100% True Peens ONLY" (any Gender that does not 100% accurately fit NEATLY into this data set is, much like hooves & tallow, immediately shunted to Elsewhere for later 'sorting and processing') => TruPeen => PEEN => P => 'HAPPY MEAL SYMBOL' => Expedient disposal of useful 'HAPPY MEAL SYMBOL'=> THE ALMIGHTY FUCKING AWESOME "." PERIOD "." FUNCTION (Our ultimate goal)

SUMMARY of historic regression of the PEEN function: ? => .
(See? It is actually VERY simple in a P- core kind of way.)

PEEN essentially sorts, shreds and spits out a simpler you. Then enters into a You-Us-They self-referential equation.

*Each definable Historic Regression stage can be a Parallel PEEN P-Core model that can be used in parallel in a larger Self-Referential system that uses Dialectical Negation as a means of artificial intelligence once enough PLACEHOLDER NODES are in effect, eventually by using the Second Shell of the Program.

*The PLACEHOLDER "." PERIOD "." Reset function also plays a key pivotal role in that it can use the PEEN function to reverse the direction to an earlier time. This is useful because there is already Programming in effect from these time periods.

*The PLACEHOLDER "." PERIOD "." Reset function can also be used in the artilect nodes to simulate artifical intelligence and learnign granted you tediously process out the extra work for it on paper. Remember the program is meant to also be human readable.

The useful thing about PEEN is that it is 'mostly' Human Readable (the parts that count at least), can be easily written on paper in parallels, meaning you can have multiple PEENs to represent different variables.



Stuart Schneiderman said...

As Shakespeare said, brevity is the soul of wit. As I have occasionally noted, commentators are not essayists. Thus, keep the comments brief and to the point... otherwise I will delete them.

Anonymous said...

Stuart,

The more one has to write in order to make a point the less that point will have real substance. Otherwise known as :baffle them with BS!

Thanks

Sam L. said...

Anon, you said waaaaaay more than a mouthful. I am quite amused by that!

Sam L. said...

Feminists seem not to want to fight Muslim men.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.