Sunday, March 17, 2019

Muslim Woman Attacks Pregnant Chelsea Clinton

We all share the grief of the victims of the Christchurch mosque massacre and there families, but there ought to be limits. Among those limits, we should not exploit their misery to blame it on the Jews. Yet, that was the approach favored by a young Muslim woman at NYU the other night.

You know the story, but here it is:

Chelsea Clinton was invited to attend a vigil for the victims at NYU. She is notably pregnant. This did not prevent a Muslim woman—apparently a Bernie supporter—from pointing a threatening finger at her and assaulting her with these words from The Daily Caller (via Maggie's Farm):

“This right here is the result of the massacre stoked by people like you and the words that you have put out into the world,” one student responded. “I want you to know that. I want you to feel that deep inside. The 49 people died because of the rhetoric you put out there.”

At issue was Chelsea’s support for Israel and her opposition to Rep. Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic rants. Apparently, supporting Israel and condemning anti-Semitism is incitement to violence against Muslims. Because Muslims, beginning with Palestinian terrorists, have always shown great respect for Israel.

Chelsea Clinton was surely taken aback. She reacted as a pregnant woman would, trying to defuse the situation. After all, she was being threatened and she preferred to step back, not to respond to a maniac.

Thereby, another one of our precious liberties, our freedom of expression, is erased, and another American citizen is obliged to accept public humiliation. Obviously, the radical American left is promoting this assault on freedom. But, don’t fool yourself. Islamist are leading the march. They are not merely doing so here; they are doing so in Europe where blasphemy laws are routinely suspended when it comes to the Prophet Mohammed. In the interest of public safety, because, presumably, Muslims do not have enough self-discipline to react calmly and dispassionately when their religion is criticized.

If she is a student, the woman who attacked Chelsea Clinton should be expelled from NYU. Clearly, she has reached a depth of depravity rarely evidenced in public forms: a full frontal attack, with threatening hand gestures, against a pregnant women. Who but the lowest of the low would do such a thing? Will anyone call her out? I doubt it.

Again, with Muslims it’s all about blaming Jews. The sad truth about Islam is that it represents one of the greatest civilizational failures of the past millennium. Muslims today have a choice between modernizing, thus adopting more Western values, and trying to deconstruct what others have built. The sensible voices within the religion have opted for the former. The crazed left, represented by Chelsea Clinton’s attacker, has chosen the latter.

If you want to know why Islam failed, consider the mindset that would produce the kind of disgraceful behavior and boundless ignorance a young woman put on display when confronting Chelsea Clinton. No courtesy. No decorum. No propriety. No respect... for a woman at her most vulnerable. Go for the jugular… of a pregnant woman. Is that acceptable behavior in the Muslim religion? Is it acceptable for Bernie supporters?


Anonymous said...

Here they are, Rose Asaf and Leen Dweik in their own words:

Ares Olympus said...

Bad thinking is everywhere. If someone is taking things personal that are not personal, they're not rational. Words do matter, and if you need to be completely innocent, never be blamed by irrational people, you should never ever say anything in public. Otherwise, facing down irrational people with empathic listening over returned anger seems the best approach.

Sam L. said...

I take it neither of those women were taught proper manners.

Anonymous said...

Sam L

What percentage of the current American woman has even a modicum of politeness and/or manners? Especially the younger ones. Politeness and manners are something they get not give. The fact that my wife and I mention, on the rare occasions that it happens, it is illustrative.

Dan Patterson said...

Thou shalt NOT peeve the insulated and protected mooslem, for he is exalted most high and siteth at the right hoof of the goat-god.
How can anyone witness such an outburst and NOT deem it a tool of an invading force?
Recall the demand for a mahhskk to be built on the site of the 9-11 attack? Ground zero? A supporter of the outpost was confronted and verbally spit on the questioner. "Build a mahhsk. Hrrrite herrrerrrh! Racist!" he jabbed from his bunker. No response was possible because duhVERSuhtee.
Tell me again about "cultural enrichment", please.